“Pledged to push for a tariff on China to force it to pay for its pollution and level the playing field for Utah businesses.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
CHAMPIONED is upheld on documented leadership, at reduced confidence. Two reachable, reputable sources with VERBATIM quotes confirm that then-Rep. John Curtis (R-Utah) was the lead House author/sponsor of the PROVE IT Act (with Rep. Scott Peters) and chairs the Conservative Climate Caucus — the leading GOP vehicle for a carbon border adjustment. E&E News (source 1) frames him as a House "champion" of the carbon-tariff conversation and carries his verbatim rationale tying the bill to Europe's CBAM and America's carbon advantage; E&E News (source 2) verbatim confirms he introduced the House version. PROVE IT is the recognized foundational/precursor legislation for the China-carbon-tariff / foreign-pollution-fee agenda the promise describes, so leading it constitutes genuine, concrete championing of the "push," well beyond a mere vote. Confidence is lowered from the original 0.73 for three reasons: (1) the Niskanen Center quote as originally cited is NOT verbatim on the page — it is a paraphrase; I corrected it to the actual page text; (2) the leadership Curtis demonstrably provided is on a data/study bill that EXPLICITLY prohibits any carbon tax or fee and grants no tariff authority, i.e. a precursor one step removed from the literal promised instrument (a tariff); (3) the actual tariff vehicle (Foreign Pollution Fee Act, S.1325, led by Cassidy/Graham) is not law and Curtis's cosponsorship there is unverified. The rating correctly does not claim the tariff passed (that is why it is CHAMPIONED, not FULL). Not downgraded to UNRATABLE because leadership is real and two independent sources support it with accurate quotes; the one inaccurate quote is redundant (its substance is corroborated by a verbatim source).
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.