“Championed the Great Salt Lake Stewardship Act to fold the Great Salt Lake into the Colorado River water-conservation program so unused Utah funds can support conservation and replenishment of the lake.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources are reachable, support the outcome, and contain the quoted text verbatim. (1) govinfo.gov (PRIMARY) confirms H.R. 4094 / Public Law No. 118-169, Great Salt Lake Stewardship Act, approved December 23, 2024 — verifying enactment. (2) curtis.senate.gov (PRIMARY) contains the exact quote "Incorporates the Great Salt Lake into ongoing Colorado River conservation efforts." and frames the measure as a Curtis-sponsored bill. (3) TownLift (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms Curtis "introduced legislation aimed at protecting the Great Salt Lake, which was successfully passed by the U.S. House" and that the bill "would include the Great Salt Lake in the ongoing conservation initiatives within the Colorado River Water Conservation Program," and separately confirms unused Central Utah Act budget authority would fund conservation — matching the promise's "unused Utah funds" element. The CHAMPIONED bar (genuine leadership + full success) is satisfied: Curtis was the lead sponsor/introducer (two independent sources describe him introducing/sponsoring the bill, not merely voting), and the bill was enacted into law as Public Law 118-169. The bill's substance matches the promise precisely. The rating does not overstate the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.