“Newsom pledged that through the state's CalRx program, California would make insulin available at about $30 for a 10mL vial (and $55 for a five-pack of pens), a roughly 90% cut from typical prices.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The pledge (2023-03-18) had two concrete CalRx deliverables, promised for 2024: insulin at ~$30 for a 10mL vial AND $55 for a five-pack of pens. All three cited sources are reachable and their quotes are genuine (verified via WebFetch). Source 1 (calrx.ca.gov, PRIMARY) confirms the $55 five-pack of pens is "now available" while the $30 vial is still "engaging with the FDA while conducting essential quality testing" — it independently confirms both the $55 pen delivery and the $30 vial target. Source 2 (chhs.ca.gov, PRIMARY) confirms the pen launch (Jan 1 2026, $45 to pharmacies / $55 per five-pack of 3mL pens, $11/pen). Source 3 (calmatters.org, REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms the delay: the Landsberg "I wish I could sit here today and say we have a date certain" quote is verbatim, the ADA impact statement is present, and it confirms the two-part price ($30 vial / $55 pen) and the missed 2024 date ("more than a year behind schedule"). So exactly one of two deliverables (the $55 pen) has materialized while the headline $30 10mL vial remains undelivered with no date certain. That is genuine partial fulfillment. The rating correctly declines FULL/CHAMPIONED despite Newsom's clear ownership of CalRx, because a core promised component is still missing and the effort ran years behind. PARTIAL is well-supported and does not overstate the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.