“Propose an additional $100 million round of tax relief for Idaho families, on top of $4.6 billion returned over the prior five years.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All four cited sources are reachable and every quoted sentence appears verbatim on the fetched pages. (1) The Jan 6, 2025 governor's-office release documents Little PROPOSING the additional $100M as the centerpiece of his own named "KEEPING PROMISES" plan — "His KEEPING PROMISES plan puts another $100 million back in Idahoan's wallets" — which is authorship/agenda-setting, not a vote or mere support. (2) The Idaho Business Review piece (Mar 26, 2025) and (3) the governor's HB304 signing release both carry the near-word-for-word framing "another $100 million in property tax relief... on top of the more than $4.6 billion," confirming the promised $100M-on-$4.6B round was enacted and signed by Little. (4) The HB40 release (Mar 6, 2025) confirms an additional $253M income-tax cut he signed, exceeding the pledge. Because the promise's action verb is "propose," and Little demonstrably authored/proposed the specific $100M round himself and then signed the enacting legislation as the executive (not a single legislative vote), the LEADERSHIP bar for CHAMPIONED is met. Confidence lowered from 0.9 to 0.85 because Little's own March 26 quote credits "my legislative partners, who championed this effort" for the bill, introducing mild CHAMPIONED-vs-FULL ambiguity — but this does not overstate the evidence given his documented proposal and signature.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.