“Deploy additional bonuses to hire and retain wildland firefighters and properly fund the state fire-suppression account.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources are reachable and their quotes verify verbatim. The PRIMARY source (Office of the Governor of Idaho) confirms wildland firefighters received one-time bonuses of up to $5,000, that more than 300 employees benefited, and that the $1M in bonuses were part of "Governor Little's KEEPING PROMISES plan" — an initiative his administration authored and deployed via executive action (Aug 1, 2025). The REPUTABLE_SECONDARY source (Missoula Current / Idaho Capital Sun) confirms the one-time $40M transfer to the Fire Suppression Deficiency Fund (bringing it to ~$52M) and $1.25M in firefighter bonuses, and explicitly documents that "Little requested a $60 million supplemental funding request... and an ongoing transfer of $40 million every year" — i.e., he initiated and drove the appropriation as the executive, not merely voting or supporting. The leadership test for CHAMPIONED is therefore satisfied: Little authored the budget initiative, requested the fire-fund funding, and personally deployed the bonuses. Confidence is held at 0.8 (not higher) because the suppression account was funded below his requested level (a one-time $40M rather than the $60M supplemental plus $40M ongoing he sought), so the "properly fund" element was only partially met. Rating upheld as CHAMPIONED.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.