Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Fully KeptGun Policy

Vowed to make Illinois the ninth state to pass an assault weapons ban.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

Fully KeptFact-checker reviewConfidence: 96%

Verified all three cited sources via WebFetch; all are reachable and support the FULL outcome. STLPR confirms Pritzker signed the assault weapons ban "making Illinois the ninth state in the nation to impose such a ban," that he "campaigned on a pledge to pursue an assault weapons ban," and that he signed it for immediate effect ("I'm signing this legislation tonight so that it can take immediate effect...") — all quoted text matches. WGLT independently confirms "making Illinois the ninth state in the nation to impose such a ban" and shows the legislative negotiation was shared among Pritzker, Speaker Welch, and Senate President Harmon — correctly supporting FULL rather than CHAMPIONED, since Pritzker's documented role was advocacy plus the executive signature, not authoring/leading the legislation. CBS News Chicago confirms Pritzker signed the ban and the "Gun violence is an epidemic..." quote appears verbatim (CBS does not use the "ninth state" framing, but the quote attributed to CBS in the rating is the epidemic quote, which is accurate; the ninth-state claim is corroborated by the other two sources). The promised outcome — enacting the ban to make Illinois the ninth such state — was delivered via the Protect Illinois Communities Act. The rating does not overstate the evidence. FULL is upheld.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →