“Overhaul the homestead deduction so every homeowner with an assessed value over $125,000 can deduct 60 percent of their home's assessed value from their tax bill.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources are reachable, support the rated outcome, and the load-bearing quotes appear verbatim. Source 1 (Inside INdiana Business) not only carries the cited "scrapped an expanded homestead deduction and tax bill caps" language but independently documents the promise's exact mechanism and its removal: under Braun's original plan a homeowner with assessed value over $125,000 "would have seen a 60% homestead deduction," and under the amended plan "the deduction would stay at $48,000" — direct proof the specific promised structure was stripped. Source 2 (KSM) verbatim confirms the standard deduction phasing out by 2030 plus the enacted 10%/$300 credit and supplemental deduction rising to 66.7%, documenting that a different homestead overhaul was enacted. Source 3 (WNDU) verbatim confirms Braun signed the bill on April 15, 2025 and the "10% or a maximum of $300 to every homestead" credit. The promise's specific 60%-of-assessed-value mechanism for homes over $125,000 was not enacted (rules out FULL/CHAMPIONED), yet a substantive homestead-deduction overhaul delivering real homeowner relief was signed into law (rules out ATTEMPTED/failure). PARTIAL is the correct, non-overstated middle rating. The modest PARTIAL-vs-ATTEMPTED interpretive room is appropriately reflected in the confidence. The rating is upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.