“Increase the statewide supply of the opioid-overdose reversal medication naloxone (Narcan) by 25%.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The cited PRIMARY source (Governor Mills's official radio address, 2023-09-01) is reachable and directly documents the promised outcome: a 25% increase in statewide naloxone distribution (25,000 doses). The increase is attributed to Mills's own administration ("we've increased our distribution") and tied to "my Administration['s]... $260 million in funding for behavioral health and substance use services" — i.e., executive-branch action she led and funded, not a mere vote or statement of support. That satisfies the leadership bar required to sustain CHAMPIONED, so no downgrade to FULL/PARTIAL is warranted, and the evidence does not overstate the claim (she delivered exactly the promised 25%). Confidence is reduced because the evidence rests on a single self-reported official statement with no independent corroboration of the metric, the promise says "supply" while the source says "distribution," and the rating's quotation was a light paraphrase rather than verbatim (corrected below).
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.