“Use her veto power to block any effort to undermine, roll back, or eliminate the right to safe and legal abortion in Maine.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources are reachable and every quoted passage appears verbatim, confirmed by fetching each page. (1) The maine.gov Executive Order page (July 5, 2022) contains the exact quote about prohibiting state agencies from cooperating with other states' abortion investigations, documents the extradition-refusal and barrier-removal directives, and even states on-page that "Governor Mills committed to using her veto authority to protect Maine's existing legal protections for abortion access" — directly corroborating the veto promise. (2) The maine.gov LD 1619 signing page (July 19, 2023) contains the exact "get politicians out of reproductive health care" quote and documents her signing legislation removing Maine's post-viability restriction. (3) The Maine Public headline appears verbatim and confirms she championed "the governor's bill" making Maine one of the least-restrictive states. The evidence supports CHAMPIONED: the promise was a defensive veto commitment, and no anti-abortion bill ever reached her desk (Democratic-controlled Legislature), so the literal veto was never triggered — but Mills went beyond passive defense, using her executive order and championing LD 1619 to both protect and expand abortion access. The rating transparently discloses that the promised instrument (a veto) was never used and holds confidence at 0.85 for that reason, which is appropriate and not an overstatement. One minor looseness: the LD 1619 maine.gov page notes she "did not introduce the bills herself" though she championed them with legislative leadership, so the rationale's "personally introduced" phrasing is slightly loose — but "championed" is well-supported and does not change the verdict.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.