“Commit to making Maryland the state that ends child poverty: "We can, and we will, end child poverty in the state of Maryland."”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources are reachable and document genuine leadership by Wes Moore on the promised goal of ending child poverty in Maryland. The Maryland Governor's Office press release (July 10, 2024) contains the cited quote verbatim — "The ENOUGH Act, a landmark piece of legislation the Moore-Miller Administration passed in the spring of 2024" — and describes the ENOUGH Initiative as "a first-of-its-kind, community-based strategy to address concentrated child poverty," backed by a $20M investment and competitive grants. This is executive leadership: Moore's administration authored and drove passage of the legislation, not a mere vote or rhetorical support, which satisfies the CHAMPIONED leadership bar. The Urban Institute piece independently corroborates the broader effort, with all four quoted fragments present ("a place-based, community-driven antipoverty grant program," "cross-agency Children's Cabinet," "raised the minimum wage," "expanded eligibility for tax credits") and explicitly credits Moore's administration with a coordinated "whole government approach" since 2023. CHAMPIONED is correct rather than FULL because the underlying goal — actually ending child poverty — has not been achieved and remains a multi-year, in-progress effort; and rather than PARTIAL/FULL because the evidence shows Moore led (authored/passed) the flagship initiative rather than merely voting for or supporting someone else's. No fabricated quotes, no unreachable sources, no overstatement of the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.