Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedPublic Safety / Gun Violence

Make Maryland the first state to launch a statewide Center for Firearm Violence Prevention and Intervention.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 95%

All three cited sources were fetched and verify the CHAMPIONED rating for this promise. (1) CBS News Baltimore confirms Maryland became the first state to answer President Biden's call (verbatim quote present), that the legislation establishes the Center for Firearm Violence Prevention within the state health department, and that Moore both PROPOSED the initiative in his legislative package and SIGNED it into law — leadership, not a mere vote. (2) The Governor's own office (PRIMARY) states verbatim that the Moore-Miller administration "spearheaded the creation of the Center for Firearm Violence Prevention and Intervention within the Maryland Department of Health," plus the $1.6M grants detail — direct evidence of leadership. (3) Fox News confirms Moore signed the bill establishing the first statewide gun violence prevention center and carries the verbatim first-state quote. The leadership bar for CHAMPIONED is satisfied (proposed + drove + signed + "spearheaded"), and the promised outcome — Maryland as the first state — was achieved exactly. No source was unreachable, no quote was fabricated (the core quoted sentences appear verbatim; bracketed phrasing in the CBS quote is editorial attribution), and the outcome does not overstate the evidence.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →