Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
AttemptedProperty taxes

Cut Nebraskans' property tax bills by 40% in 2024.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

AttemptedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 85%

All three cited sources are reachable and each supports the ATTEMPTED outcome with the quoted text appearing as claimed. (1) The Governor's Office press release (PRIMARY) confirms verbatim: "We're making sure that 45 percent of Nebraskans who have not been getting that credit will now receive a 20 percent property tax cut" and "This is not a one-and-done issue" — and shows the 40% goal was not achieved and "much more" remains. (2) Nebraska Public Media (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms LB34 "would cut property taxes overall by about 3%, and would not affect most people," and that Pillen proposed a much larger cut that "would cut property taxes in half"; the bracketed portions in the rating's quote are marked editorial insertions, not fabrication, and the core quoted phrases appear in the source. (3) Tax Foundation (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms "an additional $185 million to the existing property tax relief budget." The promise to cut property tax bills by 40% in 2024 was demonstrably not kept — Pillen pursued it forcefully (LB1/LB388 in regular session, then a special session he convened to force 40–50% relief), but the legislature passed a slimmed-down LB34 delivering only ~3% overall relief. ATTEMPTED accurately captures a genuine leadership-level effort that failed within normal process; it is not CHAMPIONED (outcome not delivered) and does not overstate the evidence — if anything it is the conservative reading, since the ~3% incidental result is too far below the 40% target and, by the governor's own framing, too marginal to count as PARTIAL delivery. Outcome is fully determinable, so not UNRATABLE.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →