“Give all state workers an 8 percent pay increase in the first year and an additional 4 percent increase the following year.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources are reachable and both quotes appear verbatim. The Nevada Independent confirms "raises ranging from 10 percent to 13 percent in the upcoming fiscal year beginning in June, and 4 percent raises the following year," confirms Lombardo signed the bill, AND confirms he originated the proposal ("Lombardo had proposed smaller increases of 8-10 percent and 4 percent in subsequent years"). The Las Vegas Sun confirms his tweet: "Our state employees are deserving of these raises. And I'm grateful we were able to deliver this crucial bill," and a ~12% raise effective July 1 plus 4% the following year. The promise (8% year one + 4% year two) mirrored Lombardo's own executive-budget proposal and was met and exceeded. The CHAMPIONED leadership bar is satisfied by the cited sources: they show executive origination (he proposed the raises as his stated priority) plus enactment (he signed the bill into law) — leadership beyond a mere vote or support. The documented nuance that the Democratic Legislature drove the first-year figure above Lombardo's own numbers is noted but does not negate that the initiative and the specific promised figures were his and that he enacted them. Confidence is slightly below the original 0.85 to reflect the reasonable alternative reading (FULL) given the Legislature drove the larger final percentages, but the leadership evidence in the sources supports CHAMPIONED.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.