“Put Oklahoma on a "path to zero" personal income tax and sign any tax cut sent to his desk, incrementally lowering the income tax rate with the stated goal of full elimination.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources are reachable, both verbatim quotes are confirmed present, and both document the correct outcome for this specific promise. The PRIMARY source (Stitt's own governor's office) confirms he signed HB 4072 creating the $200M Oklahoma Taxpayer Endowment Trust Fund to advance the "path to zero income tax," with the pivotal-moment quote present verbatim. The REPUTABLE_SECONDARY source confirms he signed HB 2764 (May 29, 2025) cutting the top marginal rate from 4.75% to 4.5%, consolidating six brackets into three, and embedding a 0.25%-increment trigger mechanism toward full elimination — matching the promise (incremental cuts with the stated goal of full elimination). On the leadership test: the second source notes Stitt did not author/sponsor HB 2764 (legislators Caldwell and Hall wrote it), but a governor cannot constitutionally author or sponsor legislation — the executive leadership pathway is setting the agenda, driving priority, and enacting the bill. The same source affirmatively documents Stitt as having "championed" the concept via his "Half and a Path" plan and being "a driving force behind the initiative's priority status," and his own office frames the signings as the "path to zero." This is genuine executive leadership, not a mere vote or passive signature, so CHAMPIONED is upheld rather than downgraded to FULL.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.