“Propose a $100 million housing production bond for the ballot, described as the largest housing production bond in state history.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All four cited sources support this outcome and their quotes are genuine. The two PRIMARY governor's-office sources verified verbatim: the 2024 State of the State contains the promise ("the budget I'll propose will call for a $100 million housing production bond on the ballot. This would be the largest housing production bond in our state's history."), and the launch press release confirms McKee delivered it to implementation ("launch of the first wave of programs supported by Rhode Island's historic $120 million housing bond approved by voters," with the McKee quote "Rhode Island isn't just talking about the housing crisis; we're building our way out of it."). The WJAR source confirms McKee and Housing Secretary Pryor formally asked lawmakers for the $100M bond, "the largest in state history," for the Nov 2024 ballot, with Pryor's quote verbatim. Ballotpedia's content (Question 3 approved, $120M, Nov 5 2024) was independently corroborated via web search when the page would not render. The CHAMPIONED bar is met: this is executive leadership of McKee's own signature initiative — he proposed it in his budget, publicly championed it, saw it referred to the ballot (increased to $120M) and approved by voters, and launched the funded programs — not a single vote or mere expression of support. The promised action (proposing the bond) was fully performed and the effort succeeded.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.