Adversarial re-check: all four sources cited by the prior rating are real, live, and accurately quoted. governor.wa.gov/priorities still carries the promise verbatim ('a bold and necessary goal of building 200,000 housing units in Washington over the next four years'). The Washington Legislature bill summary for SB 5184 (2025) confirms 'Concerning minimum parking requirements,' Governor signed May 7, Chapter 204, 2025 Laws; HB 1491 (transit-oriented housing) independently confirms signed May 13, 2025, Chapter 267, 2025 Laws (signed by Ferguson, who took office January 2025). The Dec. 18, 2025 release confirms $244 million in housing investments, $225M in Housing Trust Fund bonds, and Executive Order 25-12 creating a task force toward a Department of Housing. The March 27, 2026 Everett release confirms a seven-bill package (SB 6026, HB 2266, HB 1345, SB 6237, SB 6027, HB 2418, HB 1974). I independently verified the single strongest fact for the outcome: the Legislature's own bill summary shows SB 6026 was introduced 'By request: Governor Ferguson' and was enacted as Chapter 236, 2026 Laws — Ferguson did not merely sign others' bills, he authored and drove his own housing-supply legislation. That combination (own request legislation enacted, executive order, budget push, multiple enacted supply bills across two sessions, goal retained as a published administration priority) is squarely CHAMPIONED under the rubric's 'actively LED/sponsored/drove the effort, even if not fully enacted.' Party-neutrality test: a Republican governor with an identical record — own request bill enacted, EO issued, $244M proposed, multi-bill packages signed — would earn the same label, so this is not partisan leniency. FULL is wrong: the numeric 200,000-unit target is not met and the term does not end until January 2029. ATTEMPTED understates it, since multiple bills actually became law. PARTIAL is not used because units built are a private-market outcome and no verified unit count is attributable to the promise. CORRECTION to the prior rationale: its assertion that 'residential construction permit rates have been reported at their lowest levels since 2013' could NOT be substantiated in this pass — the March 2026 release contains no production figures and the claim is not supported by any verified source here. That unverified assertion is dropped; it was used only to argue against FULL, which is independently established by the unexpired term and unmet numeric target. Outcome and confidence stand.