“Sue the federal Bureau of Land Management to overturn its Buffalo Resource Management Plan Amendment and protect continued coal leasing in the Powder River Basin.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Adversarial re-check: all three cited sources were fetched live and each is real and on point; none were invented or misquoted. The promised action was a lawsuit, and it was filed. The Wyoming Governor's own bulletin (Dec 12, 2024) states Wyoming and Montana 'have filed suit against the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Buffalo Resource Management Plan Amendment (RMPA) that ends new federal coal leasing in the Powder River Basin,' on FLPMA and NEPA grounds, and confirms Gordon 'utilized Coal Litigation Funds appropriated by the Wyoming Legislature' to retain outside counsel (Consovoy McCarthy). Cowboy State Daily (Dec 12, 2024) independently confirms the suit was filed Wednesday Dec 11, 2024, that it seeks to have the plans thrown out as unlawful, and that Wyoming spent roughly $800,000 on outside representation. The stated objective also came to pass: Wyoming Public Media reports the Buffalo RMP was reversed by a Congressional Review Act resolution signed Dec 11, 2025, which 'reverted the Buffalo Field Office to its previous RMP, which allows new coal leasing if there is market interest.' Party-neutral test: this is an action promise ('sue X'), and the executive personally authorized, funded, and filed the suit, so the promised deliverable was 100% performed regardless of which branch ultimately delivered the reversal — the same record from a Democratic governor (e.g. suing an agency rule and having it later reversed) would equally rate FULL. CHAMPIONED (+0.75) would understate it, since that tier is for leading an effort that did not land; here the act was completed and the goal realized. I did not verify the prior rating's added claim that BLM 'formally terminated the RMPA planning process in 2026,' so I exclude it; it is not load-bearing. Confidence held at 0.93 rather than higher only because the small date discrepancy (filed Dec 11 / announced Dec 12, 2024) and the exact litigation-fund figure rest on the secondary source.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.