Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Fully KeptHealth care / Right to Try

Pledged to work tirelessly on behalf of patients and their families until federal Right to Try legislation, allowing terminally ill patients access to experimental treatments, was signed into law.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

Fully KeptFact-checker reviewConfidence: 97%

Independently verified. Ron Johnson (R-WI) was the lead Senate sponsor of federal Right to Try legislation: he introduced the Trickett Wendler Right to Try Act (S.204) in the 115th Congress and drove it through the Senate. Public Law 115-176 -- confirmed live via the GPO primary record as originating from S.204 with enactment date May 30, 2018 -- authorized terminally ill patients' access to unapproved/experimental medical products. Wikipedia and Johnson's own Senate page independently confirm he introduced and championed the bill across multiple Congresses until it was signed into law by President Trump. The promise's stated completion condition (federal Right to Try signed into law) was 100% achieved AND Johnson personally led the effort, so FULL is correct rather than CHAMPIONED (which applies when leadership occurs even without full enactment). Adversarial/partisan check: an identical record by a member of the opposite party -- pledging to work until a bill was signed, then leading it to enactment -- would earn the same FULL rating. No leniency or harshness detected. At least two real, live PRIMARY/REPUTABLE sources substantiate the outcome.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →