“Make health care more affordable and lower prescription drug costs, including lowering the cost of insulin for millions of Californians (supporting a $35/month insulin cap).”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independent re-check upholds CHAMPIONED. The cited Padilla press release is real and live and directly confirms the promise: Padilla publicly advocated the Affordable Insulin Now Act and a $35/month insulin cap at an American Diabetes Association event, stating he is 'committed to making health care more affordable and lowering prescription drug costs, including lowering the cost of insulin for millions of Californians.' The CBS News source is real and accurately quotes the 57-43 Senate vote on Aug 8, 2022 that fell short of the 60 needed to keep the $35 cap for private insurance. Wikipedia corroborates: the House passed the bill 232-193, Republicans blocked the private-market cap, but the Inflation Reduction Act (which Padilla, a CA Democrat, voted for) preserved the $35 Medicare Part D/B insulin cap plus Medicare drug-price negotiation and a $2,000 out-of-pocket cap that became law. Padilla thus went beyond a single supporting vote (public advocacy campaign + floor votes) and a substantial part of the promise was enacted, though the private-insurance insulin cap for all Californians failed. Applied neutrally, this record (public championing event + votes for the enacting law that partly succeeded) earns CHAMPIONED regardless of party. Confidence trimmed from 0.90 to 0.85 because the specific S.3700 cosponsorship detail could not be independently confirmed (congress.gov/govtrack returned 403); it is not load-bearing, since the championing is established by the confirmed advocacy event and the IRA vote.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.