“I will secure America's southern border and pass H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act, and will not send additional foreign aid before securing our own border.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified against two live, reputable Wikipedia articles. (1) H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act of 2023, passed the Republican-led House on May 3, 2023, but stalled in the Senate and never became law; the border was not secured by his legislative action. (2) In December 2023 Johnson said Ukraine aid would be 'predicated on new border-security measures,' and in February 2024 he called the bipartisan Senate border-and-aid deal 'dead on arrival.' (3) In April 2024, however, Johnson as Speaker personally shepherded a ~$61B Ukraine aid package (part of the ~$95B Ukraine/Israel/Indo-Pacific package) to House passage WITH NO border-related provision; it was signed into law by President Biden. That signature affirmative action directly reversed the promise's most operative and falsifiable plank -- 'will not send additional foreign aid before securing our own border' -- because he sent foreign aid before the border was secured. This is a measure taken against the promise's direction, so MISALIGNED (-0.75) is correct and fair under a nonpartisan standard: a politician of either party who led foreign aid to enactment after pledging 'no aid before border security' would earn the same label. It stops short of HOSTILE because he genuinely championed the H.R. 2 border-security side of the promise. It is not too harsh (he took the contradicting action himself, not merely failed to act) and not too lenient (the core condition was actively violated, precluding a positive PARTIAL). Prior rating's outcome stands; confidence nudged slightly up given the facts are well-documented and undisputed.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.