“Pass the Secure the Border Act (H.R.2) to resume construction of the southern border wall and reinstate the 'Remain in Mexico' policy.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified. H.R.2, the Secure the Border Act, passed the House 219-213 on May 11, 2023 (confirmed by ABC News and LegalClarity, both fetch-verified live). The bill does exactly what the promise describes: it restarts border wall construction and reinstates the 'Remain in Mexico' policy (ABC News). Steve Scalise was House Majority Leader of the 118th Congress and, in that role, controlled the floor schedule and drove this designated leadership-priority bill (bill number H.R.2) to passage in the chamber he leads - well beyond a single supporting vote, which is the CHAMPIONED standard. The bill then died in the Senate and never became law, so wall construction was not actually resumed and Remain in Mexico was not reinstated through this bill (LegalClarity: received by the Senate but never advanced to a floor vote; expired when the 118th Congress ended in January 2025). Leading the effort to House passage without full enactment matches CHAMPIONED (+0.75), not FULL. Fairness check: a majority-party leader of either party who drove a flagship promised bill through their chamber to passage - only for it to die in the other chamber - would earn the same CHAMPIONED label; the standard is applied symmetrically. Note: the bill's formal sponsor was Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, not Scalise personally, but Scalise's championing rests on his institutional leadership role driving floor passage, which is well-documented and correct.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.