Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Fully KeptTaxes

Signed the Americans for Tax Reform Taxpayer Protection Pledge, committing to oppose any and all efforts to increase federal income tax rates on individuals or businesses and to oppose any net reduction or elimination of tax deductions or credits unless matched dollar-for-dollar by further rate cuts.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

Fully KeptFact-checker reviewConfidence: 88%

McClain's record since taking office in Jan 2021 fully honors the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. Wikipedia confirms she voted against the American Rescue Plan (2021) and the Inflation Reduction Act (2022), both of which raised federal taxes, and she supported the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act extending the TCJA tax cuts. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce independently describes her as a leader on tax reform 'working to ensure American businesses and workers won't face the largest automatic tax increase in American history.' No source shows her ever voting for a federal income-tax-rate increase, so the no-tax-increase pledge has been kept essentially 100% (FULL). The standard is applied neutrally: a member of either party with an equivalently consistent, adhered pledge would earn FULL. Confidence is 0.88 rather than higher because I could not directly confirm her 2020 entry on ATR's public signer list (the 2025 Michigan list shows only Tom Barrett; ATR treats candidate-signed pledges as binding for the term and does not re-list incumbents each cycle), but the substantive adherence record is well corroborated.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →