“Enact congressional term limits — a constitutional amendment capping service in Congress at 12 years. Arrington introduced H.J.Res.134 in the 115th Congress to impose these limits and campaigned on it as 'the only bipartisan term limits bill.'”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified. The core claim is real and correctly rated. GovInfo (U.S. Government Publishing Office) PRIMARY record BILLS-115hjres134ih confirms Jodey C. Arrington was the SPONSOR (not merely a cosponsor) of H.J.Res.134 in the 115th Congress, 'Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress' (introduced May 10, 2018, referred to the Committee on the Judiciary). He sustained the effort across Congresses: the U.S. Term Limits page on Arrington confirms he cosponsored the shorter-term amendment (HJR12, 117th Congress) and states he 'has long been a supporter of term limits on Congress, previously sponsoring resolutions with terms of longer duration.' The 118th-Congress H.J.Res.11 (sponsor Ralph Norman, 43 cosponsors) is a genuine, live term-limits constitutional amendment consistent with his continued backing. This is active LEADERSHIP — introducing his own constitutional amendment plus repeated cosponsorship — which is well beyond a single supporting vote, so it maps to CHAMPIONED, not ATTEMPTED. It is not FULL: a constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds supermajority in both chambers and ratification by three-fourths of the states, and none of these resolutions advanced beyond committee referral, so term limits were never enacted. Applying the same standard to either party, sponsoring one's own amendment and repeatedly cosponsoring the effort without enactment is CHAMPIONED. Confidence 0.85 is appropriate. (Note: the cited congress.gov URL is a real, legitimate source but currently returns 403 to automated fetch; the GovInfo PRIMARY records independently substantiate the identical facts.)
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.