“Sponsor and push to enact the Housing Crisis Response Act to respond to the U.S. housing affordability crisis; reintroduced in the 118th (H.R.4233) and 119th (H.R.6771) Congresses.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified via GovTrack (Congress.gov was bot-blocked but the same primary records confirm). Maxine Waters is the lead sponsor/author of the Housing Crisis Response Act in both cited Congresses: H.R.4233 'Housing Crisis Response Act of 2023' (118th), sponsor Rep. Maxine Waters [D-CA-43], introduced June 21, 2023, referred to committee and never received a vote; and H.R.6771 'Housing Crisis Response Act of 2025' (119th), sponsor Waters, introduced December 17, 2025, referred to committee (pending, not enacted). She originated and repeatedly reintroduced the legislation across two Congresses, so she actively LED and drove the effort well beyond a single supporting vote. However, the promise to 'push to enact' was not fulfilled: both versions stalled in committee with no floor vote or passage (Democrats were in the House minority both Congresses). This is a clean fit for CHAMPIONED (+0.75): led/sponsored/drove the effort, not fully enacted. Applying the same nonpartisan standard, any lead sponsor who authors and reintroduces a named bill but never advances it past committee referral earns CHAMPIONED, not FULL and not merely ATTEMPTED. Confidence 0.9: sponsorship is an unambiguous primary-record fact; the only judgment call is CHAMPIONED vs PARTIAL, and since zero of the bill was enacted, CHAMPIONED (led-but-not-landed) is correct.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.