Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedPuerto Rico

Sponsor and advance the Puerto Rico Self-Determination Act (H.R. 2070, 117th Congress), which would recognize the right of the people of Puerto Rico to call a binding status convention through which they exercise self-determination, and establish a mechanism for congressional consideration of that decision.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 90%

Independently verified. Rep. Nydia Velazquez [D-NY-7] was the lead sponsor of H.R. 2070, the Puerto Rico Self-Determination Act of 2021, introduced 03/18/2021 in the 117th Congress. She did far more than cast a supporting vote: the House Natural Resources Committee held legislative hearings on the bill (April 14, 2021 and June 16, 2021), and she then negotiated a compromise that merged her self-determination approach with the competing statehood bill into H.R. 8393, the Puerto Rico Status Act, which she co-sponsored and which passed the House 233-191 on Dec. 15, 2022. The measure died in the Senate and was never enacted, and the exact 'binding status convention' mechanism was ultimately replaced by a three-option plebiscite in the compromise bill, so this is active championing rather than full fulfillment. The CHAMPIONED (+0.75) label is fair under a nonpartisan standard: a lead sponsor who drove committee hearings and floor passage of a related compromise, but did not achieve enactment, would receive the same label regardless of party. Confidence 0.9 reflects strong primary-source corroboration.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →