“Enact the Emergency Wildfire Fighting Technology Act to require federal agencies to deploy modern technology to detect and fight wildfires; sponsored the bill in the 118th (H.R. 3389) and 119th (H.R. 836) Congresses, both passed by the House.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified via govinfo.gov primary bill-status XML for both bills. H.R. 3389 (118th Cong.): Valadao introduced 5/16/2023, House Natural Resources Committee markup 6/13/2023, House passed by voice vote 9/12/2023, referred to Senate Agriculture Committee 9/13/2023, no further Senate action. H.R. 836 (119th Cong.): Valadao introduced 1/31/2025, House passed by voice vote 2/5/2025, referred to Senate Agriculture Committee 2/6/2025, no further Senate action. Valadao is the primary sponsor of both versions and drove both to House passage — clearly more than a single supporting vote. Neither has been enacted (Senate has not acted), so this is not FULL. CHAMPIONED (+0.75) is correct: he actively led/sponsored/drove the effort, but final enactment did not happen. Same standard would apply to any party's sponsor of a twice-House-passed bill stalled in the Senate.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.