“Fight to ban stock trading by members of Congress and close lobbyist loopholes.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified via WebFetch on both cited primary/reputable sources. Colorado General Assembly official page confirms Rutinel serves in the Colorado state House (HD-32) and his 2026 sponsored bills cover law enforcement tracing, massage regulation, tax credits, homelessness, motor-vehicle crash reporting, and worker safety — none touch stock trading, lobbying, or ethics reform. Wikipedia confirms he assumed CO House office Oct 13, 2023 and is the Democratic nominee for CO-8 (general election November 2026), i.e., not yet a U.S. Congressman. This promise targets federal action (Congress members' stock trading; lobbyist loopholes typically federal) so he has no direct opportunity to act until seated. The state-level record shows no analogous state ethics/lobbying bill either. NO_OPPORTUNITY is the neutral, evidence-appropriate label — the same rating would apply to any non-incumbent challenger of any party. This is a nonpartisan judgment based on the record.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.