“Cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month for every American.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified both primary sources. (1) Colorado General Assembly page for HB24-1438 confirms Rep. M. Rutinel as a co-sponsor and the bill's insulin-affordability content (transfers insulin affordability program to State Board of Pharmacy; makes manufacturer non-compliance a deceptive trade practice); House passed 45-14. (2) Rutinel's campaign site verbatim: 'I want to cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month for every American who needs it and provide similar benefits for other essential medicines.' The promise is federal in scope ('every American'), but Rutinel is a state representative (HD-32) who, as of Sept 2026, is the Democratic nominee for U.S. House CD-8 and would not be seated federally until January 2027. He therefore has had no vehicle to enact a nationwide $35 insulin cap. His state-level co-sponsorship of HB24-1438 is aligned with the direction of the promise but concerns Colorado's separate program, not a nationwide cap, so it does not qualify as ATTEMPTED on the federal-scope promise. Under an equal standard, a Republican candidate for the same seat with an identical situation would also warrant NO_OPPORTUNITY. Rating held.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.