“Vote against any national abortion ban and support a federal law guaranteeing abortion access nationwide.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both prongs advanced but neither enacted. PRONG 1 (vote against a national abortion ban): Confirmed via clerk.house.gov XML that on H.R. 26 (Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act) Roll Call #29 on Jan 11 2023, Gluesenkamp Perez voted NAY on final passage (220-210). (Prior rating cited Roll #28 motion-to-recommit, where she voted YEA — same anti-bill direction, but the correct citation is Roll #29 final passage.) PRONG 2 (federal law guaranteeing abortion access): Confirmed via Congress.gov bill text XML for 119th Cong. H.R. 12 (Women's Health Protection Act of 2025), sponsored by Rep. Judy Chu, that 'Ms. Perez' with bioguide name-id G000600 (= Marie Gluesenkamp Perez) is among the 200+ cosponsors. Her official House.gov press release confirms she helped reintroduce the Protecting Reproductive Freedom Act to protect FDA authority over mifepristone. She is one of many cosponsors, not a lead sponsor, so this does not rise to CHAMPIONED; but she has done more than a single supporting vote, so it is above IGNORED. No national abortion ban has been enacted for her to face a full-passage test. ATTEMPTED (+0.25) is the correct label. Revising to fix the vote citation.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.