“Advance the bipartisan Flooding Prevention, Assessment, and Restoration Act (introduced with Rep. Marcus Molinaro) to empower the Natural Resources Conservation Service to improve rural communities' access to federal flood-mitigation programs and enhance flood protection beyond pre-disaster levels.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Verified via primary sources: Davis's own Aug 22, 2023 press release confirms he introduced the Flooding Prevention, Assessment, and Restoration Act with Rep. Molinaro (R-NY) and cosponsors Spanberger and Nunn, doing exactly what the promise describes (empowering NRCS/EWP to restore flood protection above pre-disaster conditions, national ag flood vulnerability study, reduced cost-share for limited-resource areas). A second primary source (Davis's Apr 30, 2026 press release on H.R. 7567) confirms 'provisions from H.R. 1858, Flooding Prevention, Assessment, and Restoration Act, introduced by Congressman Davis' were included in the House-passed Farm Bill, which Davis voted to advance. He is lead sponsor across two Congresses and drove language into a broader vehicle, but the standalone act has not been enacted and the Farm Bill has only cleared the House. That is textbook CHAMPIONED (+0.75), not FULL. The same standard would apply to any party; a Republican lead sponsor with identical record would rate identically.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.