Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Adam Smith

DemocratAdam Smith

U.S. Representative · Washington

Washington's 9th district

DemocratFederal

U.S. Representative from Washington

5 tracked promises, 5 rated

Washington · Washington's 9th district

Washington's 9th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →
92/100
Trust rating
Strongly keeps promises
92
0 · Broken50 · Mixed100 · Kept
A transparent rescale of the Integrity Score (+83) to 0–100, aggregated from 5 rated promises. Never an opaque single score.
How this is calculated →

Running against

How they won their seat

Adam Smith won the 2024 U.S. House election in Washington (District 9) with 65.4% of the vote (182,780 votes).

65.4%
Win share
182,780
Votes for winner
279,298
Total cast
  • Adam Smith · Democrat65.4%
  • Melissa Chaudhry · Democrat32.4%
  • Writein · Na2.1%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Adam Smith's record indicates a pattern of sponsored bills related to education, workforce training, and housing issues, as evidenced by bills such as the 'Empowering Individuals to Succeed Through Education and Workforce Training Act' and the 'HOPE for Homeownership Act.' Additionally, there is a pattern of sponsored bills related to health and community service, highlighted by the 'Behavioral Health Crisis Care Centers Act' and the 'Expanding Service Coordinators Act.' Focus areas (from the record): Education · Workforce Development · Housing Affordability · Health Services · Community Service Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The comparison cannot be made due to lack of evidence regarding declared positions or tracked promises to compare against the inferred activity patterns in Smith's sponsored bills and voting record. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on the politician's stated goals or intentions; The record does not indicate the impact of campaign finance on legislative priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Adam Smith has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2025. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Adam Smith has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Votes cast
361
Voted yea
139
Voted nay
214
Bills sponsored
16
Committees
1

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Monthly voting activity

  • Yea
  • Nay
  • Total
016324864VotesJan '25: 14 YeaJan '25: 11 NayJan '25Feb '25: 13 YeaFeb '25: 13 NayFeb '25Mar '25: 13 YeaMar '25: 18 NayMar '25Apr '25: 11 YeaApr '25: 16 NayApr '25May '25: 14 YeaMay '25: 19 NayMay '25Jun '25: 18 YeaJun '25: 21 NayJun '25Jul '25: 6 YeaJul '25: 22 NayJul '25Sep '25: 16 YeaSep '25: 48 NaySep '25Nov '25: 8 YeaNov '25: 15 NayNov '25Dec '25: 26 YeaDec '25: 31 NayDec '25Jan '25: 26 totalFeb '25: 26 totalMar '25: 32 totalApr '25: 27 totalMay '25: 33 totalJun '25: 40 totalJul '25: 33 totalSep '25: 64 totalNov '25: 23 totalDec '25: 57 total
Measures voted on:281 passed79 failed1 procedural/other

Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.

Vote attendance

97.8%
attendance
353 of 361 roll calls8 missed
Monthly participation rate
0255075100100%Jan 25Mar 25May 25Jul 25Nov 25Dec 25

Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

16bills sponsored
16 pending
05101520Bills2025: 16 pending162025

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Independence

0.85%
Votes against own party
3 of 353 recent votes

How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.

Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 16 sponsored bills became law
16 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$740K
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$250K$500K$750K$1M2026: raised $740K2026: spent $643K20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $49K (7%)7%Large individual (itemized): $249K (35%)35%PAC / committee: $412K (58%)58%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$49K7%
  • Large individual (itemized)$249K35%
  • PAC / committee$412K58%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Source: Congress.gov.

Integrity

Promises kept vs. worked against — weighted breakdown

+83 · based on 5 rated promises

  • Championed 3
  • Fully Kept 2

Teal segments are promises kept; amber and stone segments are promises worked against. The signed score weights each rated promise by significance and evidence confidence. Promise-keeping is shown separately from popularity, finance, disclosure, and stated positions. Methodology is open.

Integrity over time

In office since Jan 2019 · 5 rated promises

Each step is a real change in the sourced record — the score holds between assessments.

−100 worked against0+100 kept

Promise status over time

How the tracked promise record has evolved.

5 tracked
  • Kept5
  • Against0
  • No opportunity0
  • In progress0
0246Jul 2026Jul 2026Jul 2026

Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.

Topic coverage

5 promises across 4 topics

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Housing2
  • Abortion / Reproductive Rights1
  • Government Ethics / Accountability1
  • Health Care1
Kept Worked against No opportunity / not yet scored

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Primary (official record)5100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
21
32
42
50

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

5 tracked promises

Championedhigh confidence

Ban hedge funds and private equity firms from owning single-family homes by passing the End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act (H.R.6608), which he authored — forcing large investors to sell at least 10% of their single-family homes to families each year until they are fully divested over 10 years.

HousingSpecific · measurablePromised Dec 2023
Sourceshttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6608/texthttps://www.merkley.senate.gov/merkley-smith-lead-bicameral-action-to-ban-hedge-fund-ownership-of-residential-housing/https://adamsmith.house.gov/news/press-releases/representative-smith-and-senator-merkley-lead-bicameral-action-ban-hedge-fundhttps://nextcity.org/urbanist-news/meet-the-bill-to-ban-hedge-funds-from-owning-single-family-homeshttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6608https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/118/hr6608
Championedhigh confidence

Codify the right to abortion nationwide by co-sponsoring and voting for the Women's Health Protection Act, creating a statutory federal right to provide and receive abortion care.

Abortion / Reproductive RightsSpecific · measurablePromised Sep 2021
Sourceshttps://adamsmith.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-smith-votes-pass-womens-health-protection-act-2021https://www.congress.gov/member/adam-smith/S000510https://electadamsmith.com/priorities/https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2021/roll295.xmlhttps://clerk.house.gov/evs/2022/roll360.xmlhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3755/cosponsors
Championedmedium confidence

Ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks — co-sponsor the Ban Conflicted Trading Act (H.R.1579) and support the Restore Trust in Congress Act to prohibit sitting lawmakers from trading stocks.

Government Ethics / AccountabilityPromised Feb 2022
Sourceshttps://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1579/cosponsorshttps://electadamsmith.com/priorities/https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/117/hr/BILLSTATUS-117hr1579.xml
Fully Kepthigh confidence

Sponsor and pass the Promoting Affordable Housing Near Transit Act, allowing nonprofits to receive surplus federal transit land at zero cost to build housing in which at least 40% of units are affordable to households at or below 60% of Area Median Income and remain affordable for 30 years.

HousingPromised Jun 2021
Sourceshttps://adamsmith.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-smith-introduces-bill-promoting-affordable-housing-near-transithttps://upforgrowth.org/news_insights/promoting-affordable-housing-near-transit-act-included-in-2022-defense-authorization-bill/https://electadamsmith.com/priorities/https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ81/PLAW-117publ81.htmhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3680
Fully Kepthigh confidence

Co-sponsor the State-Based Universal Health Care Act to let states establish their own universal/single-payer health care systems by streamlining federal waivers and funding.

Health CarePromised Jan 2019
Sourceshttps://www.healthcareforallwa.org/rep_khanna_introduced_state_based_universal_health_care_act_of_2019https://www.congress.gov/member/adam-smith/S000510https://electadamsmith.com/priorities/https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-116hr5010ihhttps://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-117hr3775ih

Verified record

202 sponsored bills

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
256
Nay
335
Present
0
Not voting
18

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

4 positions on record

What this official says they believe — sourced claims, shown distinctly from tracked promises and from any assessment of what they did. A stated position is never scored and never affects the Integrity Score.

  • HousingStated position

    Ban hedge funds and private equity firms from owning single-family homes by passing the End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act (H.R.6608), which he authored — forcing large investors to sell at least 10% of their single-family homes to families each year until they are fully divested over 10 years.

    Sourceshttps://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6608/texthttps://www.merkley.senate.gov/merkley-smith-lead-bicameral-action-to-ban-hedge-fund-ownership-of-residential-housing/https://adamsmith.house.gov/news/press-releases/representative-smith-and-senator-merkley-lead-bicameral-action-ban-hedge-fundhttps://nextcity.org/urbanist-news/meet-the-bill-to-ban-hedge-funds-from-owning-single-family-homes
    View position & sources →
  • Government Ethics / AccountabilityStated position

    Ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks — co-sponsor the Ban Conflicted Trading Act (H.R.1579) and support the Restore Trust in Congress Act to prohibit sitting lawmakers from trading stocks.

    Sourceshttps://electadamsmith.com/priorities/https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1579/cosponsors
    View position & sources →
  • Abortion / Reproductive RightsStated position

    Codify the right to abortion nationwide by co-sponsoring and voting for the Women's Health Protection Act, creating a statutory federal right to provide and receive abortion care.

    Sourceshttps://adamsmith.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-smith-votes-pass-womens-health-protection-act-2021https://www.congress.gov/member/adam-smith/S000510https://electadamsmith.com/priorities/
    View position & sources →
  • Health CareStated position

    Co-sponsor the State-Based Universal Health Care Act to let states establish their own universal/single-payer health care systems by streamlining federal waivers and funding.

    Sourceshttps://www.healthcareforallwa.org/rep_khanna_introduced_state_based_universal_health_care_act_of_2019https://www.congress.gov/member/adam-smith/S000510https://electadamsmith.com/priorities/
    View position & sources →
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Adam Smith more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →