This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Al Green's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratAl Green
U.S. Representative · Texas
Texas's 9th district
U.S. Representative from Texas
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Al Green won the 2024 U.S. House election in Texas (District 9) with 100% of the vote (184,141 votes).
- Al Green · Democrat100%184,141
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Al Green's record shows a concentration on resolutions and legislation addressing civil rights, social justice, and public service recognition. Sponsored bills include HRES 939 and HRES 769. His committee memberships include financial services and homeland security. Focus areas (from the record): Civil Rights · Social Justice · Public Service · Financial Oversight · Homeland Security Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Al Green's legislative activity and voting record. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of his sponsored bills in achieving their intended outcomes is unclear; No information is available regarding his unlogged work or informal influence. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Al Green has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2026. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Al Green has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$9K2%
- Large individual (itemized)$321K63%
- PAC / committee$179K35%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Homeland SecurityOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Homeland Security — Oversight, Investigations, and AccountabilityOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Homeland Security — Border Security and EnforcementOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Oversight and InvestigationsOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Financial InstitutionsOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
343 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,510,814, spent $1,404,065, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1425: Original Resolution Honoring Transportation Security Officers for their Sacrifice and Dedication to Public Service During Federal Government Shutdowns ↗Jul 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9579: Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Authorization Act ↗Jul 2, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1405: Encouraging the celebration of the month of June as LGBTQIA+ Pride Month. ↗Jun 30, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1313: Original Resolution Condemning the Hateful Comments of Texas Congressional Candidate Maureen Galindo ↗May 21, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8647: Representative Green's Original Legislation to increase from 9 to 13 the number of justices of the Supreme Court. ↗May 4, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 160: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-04: Whistleblower Protections Under CFPA Section 1057". ↗Apr 30, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1225: Original Resolution Commending the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for its efforts to facilitate peace between the United States and Israel with Iran ↗Apr 29, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1226: Original Resolution Condemning President Donald J. Trump for his disgraceful, despicable, and disrespectful social media post depicting himself as Jesus Christ, diminishing the dignity of the Presidency and bringing disrepute to the office ↗Apr 29, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8411: Original Legislation to Give TSA Employees a Raise ↗Apr 21, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8318: Original Additional Credit FHA Pilot Program Authorization Act ↗Apr 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8292: Original Alternative Data for Additional Credit FHA Pilot Program Reauthorization Act ↗Apr 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8291: Reforming Disaster Recovery Act ↗Apr 15, 2026
Showing the 12 most recent of 343 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 273
- Nay
- 375
- Present
- 2
- Not voting
- 5
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record urging congressional leadership to attach Fourth Amendment protections to FISA Section 702 reauthorization: closing the data broker loophole and requiring a judicial warrant before the government accesses Americans' sensitive information, ending the Section 702 backdoor search loophole, and repealing the Section 702 'visa vetting' provision.
SourcesLetter from 53 Members of Congress to Speaker Mike Johnson, Leader John Thune, Leader Charles E. Schumer and Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Fourth Amendment protections in FISA Section 702 reauthorizationView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record demanding that DHS and ICE account for their use of Palantir-developed data analytics together with Clearview AI facial recognition, PenLink, L3Harris stingray and Paragon Solutions phone surveillance, and objecting to a mass surveillance ecosystem that has swept in U.S. citizens observing or protesting immigration enforcement.
SourcesLetter from Reps. Dan Goldman and Nydia M. Velazquez, Sen. Ron Wyden and 30 colleagues to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and ICE Acting Director Todd M. Lyons on Palantir-developed data surveillance contractsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.