This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez
U.S. Representative · New York
New York's 14th district
U.S. Representative from New York
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won the 2024 U.S. House election in New York (District 14) with 68.9% of the vote (132,714 votes).
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez · Democrat68.9%132,714
- Tina Forte · Conservative30.7%59,078
- Blank · Na6.4%12,366
- 1 Other Candidate0.4%759
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
The record includes sponsorship of bills related to climate change, housing, and healthcare, as evidenced by the sponsorship of bills such as the Green New Deal for Public Housing Act (HR 7782), the Fair Wages for Home Care Workers Act (HR 7917), and various initiatives aimed at environmental sustainability. The record includes bills that address social justice and equity, reflected in bills like the Loving v. Virginia Codification Act of 2022 (HR 8396) and the Fair Chance Improvement Act (HR 6419). Focus areas (from the record): Climate Change · Housing · Healthcare · Social Justice · Environmental Sustainability Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against the inferred activity patterns. Therefore, it is not possible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills or the politician's influence on their outcomes; There is no information on the politician's unlogged work or informal initiatives outside of the official record; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess the consistency of actions with stated goals. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2019. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$21.5M67%
- Large individual (itemized)$10.4M33%
- PAC / committee$28K0%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Energy and CommerceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Oversight and InvestigationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — EnergyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — HealthOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
61 sponsored billsFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9442: Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act ↗Jun 24, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9395: Transparency in Medicare Advantage Steering Act ↗Jun 23, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7917: Fair Wages for Home Care Workers Act ↗Mar 12, 2026
- Sponsored HR 5333: 9/11 Immigrant Worker Freedom Act ↗Sep 11, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3562: DEFIANCE Act of 2025 ↗May 21, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3302: Healthy Start Reauthorization Act of 2025 ↗May 8, 2025
- Sponsored HR 1944: 10 Percent Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Act ↗Mar 6, 2025
- Sponsored HR 398: Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2025 ↗Jan 14, 2025
- Sponsored HR 360: Oyster Reef Recovery Act of 2025 ↗Jan 13, 2025
- Sponsored HR 9705: Oyster Reef Recovery Act ↗Sep 19, 2024
- Sponsored HR 9662: Homes Act of 2024 ↗Sep 18, 2024
- Sponsored HRES 1354: Impeaching Samuel Alito, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. ↗Jul 10, 2024
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 252
- Nay
- 385
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 18
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Nay
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record demanding that DHS and ICE account for their use of Palantir-developed data analytics together with Clearview AI facial recognition, PenLink, L3Harris stingray and Paragon Solutions phone surveillance, and objecting to a mass surveillance ecosystem that has swept in U.S. citizens observing or protesting immigration enforcement.
SourcesLetter from Reps. Dan Goldman and Nydia M. Velazquez, Sen. Ron Wyden and 30 colleagues to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and ICE Acting Director Todd M. Lyons on Palantir-developed data surveillance contractsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record asserting that the government ordinarily must obtain a judicial warrant to compel cell phone location data, and urging the DHS Inspector General to open a second investigation into ICE and other DHS components purchasing Americans' location data from commercial data brokers without one.
SourcesBicameral letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari requesting a second investigation of warrantless purchases of Americans' cell phone location data by ICE and other DHS componentsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.