Democrat, Bridget Brink
Unknown Office · Michigan
, Bridget Brink is the Democrat Unknown Office for Michigan. StumpWatch tracks , Bridget Brink's record — campaign promises, sourced positions, votes, and legislative activity — and whether they keep their word.
7 tracked promises, 4 rated
Michigan
Represents Michigan statewide
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
All 4 rated promises on file are marked “no opportunity to act” — a real observation, but one that says nothing about whether they keep their word.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$697K24%
- Large individual (itemized)$2.2M74%
- PAC / committee$59K2%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Integrity
No score yetNot enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.
Integrity over time
Tenure dates not on file · 4 rated promisesThe line steps at each recorded assessment and holds between them; it ends on the current published score.
| Date | Integrity Score |
|---|---|
| Sep 2026 | |
| Sep 2026 | |
| Sep 2026 | |
| Sep 2026 | |
| now | (current, held from last rating) |
Promise status over time
How the tracked promise record has evolved.
- Kept0
- Against0
- No opportunity4
- In progress0
Replayed from this official’s sourced assessment history — the bands step only when an assessment is recorded or changed. Based on the most recent roll-call votes on file and the tracked promise assessments; never interpolated.
Topic coverage
7 promises across 3 topicsWhat this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.
- Healthcare3
- Government Ethics & Anti-Corruption2
- Prescription Drugs2
Evidence & significance
Evidence quality
Strongest source cited per promise.
- Primary (official record)7100%
Significance mix
How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).
Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.
7 tracked promises
“Reverse the Medicaid cuts in the 2025 reconciliation law (repeal what she calls the 'Big Ugly Bill').”
“Fully extend the Affordable Care Act premium tax credits to lower insurance costs.”
“Create a public health insurance option.”
“Cap the cost of insulin at $35 for all Americans.”
“Ban individual stock trading by members of Congress (as well as the President, Vice President, executive-branch appointees, and Supreme Court justices).”
“Support a federal ban on direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising on television.”
“Pass a constitutional amendment to establish term limits for members of Congress.”
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- HealthcareStated position
Reverse the Medicaid cuts in the 2025 reconciliation law (repeal what she calls the 'Big Ugly Bill').
SourcesBridget Brink for Congress (official campaign site)WHMI 93.5 FMView position & sources → - Prescription DrugsStated position
Cap the cost of insulin at $35 for all Americans.
SourcesBridget Brink for Congress (official campaign site)WHMI 93.5 FMView position & sources → - Government Ethics & Anti-CorruptionStated position
Ban individual stock trading by members of Congress (as well as the President, Vice President, executive-branch appointees, and Supreme Court justices).
SourcesMichigan AdvanceBridget Brink for Congress (official campaign site)View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.
Office context & community edit history
Help complete the record on this official
What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks , Bridget Brink more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.