Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
No opportunityHealthcare

Fully extend the Affordable Care Act premium tax credits to lower insurance costs.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in to suggest a correction

Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

No opportunityFact-checker reviewConfidence: 78%

Independently verified. Bridget Brink is a candidate for Michigan's 7th congressional district, not a sitting member of Congress. Her official campaign healthcare page carries the exact promise ('Fully extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits to bring down insurance costs for at least 24 million Americans who have had them double or even triple'). Wikipedia confirms she lost the August 2026 Democratic primary to activist William Lawrence, who now advances to the general against Republican incumbent Tom Barrett. Because Brink never held federal legislative office after making the promise and is no longer on the ballot after the primary, she had no genuine opportunity to sponsor, vote on, or otherwise advance an ACA premium tax credit extension. NO_OPPORTUNITY is the correct nonpartisan label — the same standard would apply to any losing primary candidate of any party. Both sources are real and support the outcome; one is primary (the campaign statement establishing the promise), one is reputable secondary (biographical confirmation of primary defeat).

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →