This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Chellie Pingree's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratChellie Pingree
U.S. Representative · Maine
Maine's 1st district
U.S. Representative from Maine
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Chellie Pingree won the 2024 U.S. House election in Maine (District 1) with 58.7% of the vote (249,798 votes).
- Chellie Pingree · Democrat58.7%249,798
- Ronald C. Russell · Republican36.4%154,849
- Ethan Weld Alcorn · Unenrolled Independent4.9%20,883
- Blank · Na3.3%14,037
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Chellie Pingree's record shows a concentration on agricultural issues, environmental concerns, and support for veterans. Notable sponsored bills include the 'Agricultural Management Assistance Act of 2026' and the 'Relief for Farmers Hit with PFAS Act', suggesting involvement in farming and food safety. Additionally, her committee memberships reflect an emphasis on appropriations related to agriculture and environmental matters. Focus areas (from the record): Agriculture · Environmental Protection · Veterans Affairs · Food Safety · Rural Development Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The available data does not provide declared positions or tracked promises to compare against her sponsored bills and voting record. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of her sponsored bills cannot be assessed due to lack of data; The impact of her committee work on legislation cannot be assessed due to lack of data; Such commitments cannot be verified. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Chellie Pingree has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2025. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Chellie Pingree has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$167K21%
- Large individual (itemized)$314K40%
- PAC / committee$298K38%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on AgricultureOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on AppropriationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Interior, Environment, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
171 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $388,186, spent $358,425, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9528: People Over Poison Act ↗Jun 29, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7947: Agricultural Management Assistance Act of 2026 ↗Mar 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7743: Stop ICE Intimidation Act of 2026 ↗Feb 26, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7708: PAPERS Act of 2026 ↗Feb 25, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1027: Supporting the designation of the "International Year of the Woman Farmer" to recognize and honor the critical role of women in agriculture. ↗Jan 30, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7267: Produce Prescriptions for Veterans Act ↗Jan 27, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6476: Relief for Farmers Hit with PFAS Act ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 817: Supporting the designation of October 16, 2025, and October 16, 2026, as "World Food Day". ↗Oct 17, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4987: Food Date Labeling Act of 2025 ↗Aug 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4861: Working Waterfront Disaster Mitigation Tax Credit Act ↗Aug 1, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 584: Affirming the support of the United States for Montenegro's accession to the European Union. ↗Jul 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4303: To establish a Special Envoy for Humanitarian Aid Workers, and for other purposes. ↗Jul 7, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 265
- Nay
- 359
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 30
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record demanding that DHS and ICE account for their use of Palantir-developed data analytics together with Clearview AI facial recognition, PenLink, L3Harris stingray and Paragon Solutions phone surveillance, and objecting to a mass surveillance ecosystem that has swept in U.S. citizens observing or protesting immigration enforcement.
SourcesLetter from Reps. Dan Goldman and Nydia M. Velazquez, Sen. Ron Wyden and 30 colleagues to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and ICE Acting Director Todd M. Lyons on Palantir-developed data surveillance contractsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record urging congressional leadership to attach Fourth Amendment protections to FISA Section 702 reauthorization: closing the data broker loophole and requiring a judicial warrant before the government accesses Americans' sensitive information, ending the Section 702 backdoor search loophole, and repealing the Section 702 'visa vetting' provision.
SourcesLetter from 53 Members of Congress to Speaker Mike Johnson, Leader John Thune, Leader Charles E. Schumer and Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Fourth Amendment protections in FISA Section 702 reauthorizationView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.