This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Cleo Fields's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

DemocratCleo Fields
U.S. Representative · Louisiana
Louisiana's 6th district
U.S. Representative from Louisiana
0 tracked promises
Running against
How they won their seat
Cleo Fields won the 2024 U.S. House election in Louisiana (District 6) with 50.8% of the vote (150,323 votes).
- Cleo Fields · Democrat50.8%150,323
- Elbert Guillory · Republican37.7%111,737
- Quentin Anthony Anderson · Democrat8%23,811
- Peter Williams · Democrat2.1%6,252
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Cleo Fields' record includes sponsorship of bills related to financial services, education, and consumer protection, such as the NFIP Premium Transparency Act and the Teacher Loan Forgiveness Enhancement Act. His committee memberships are noted without inferring alignment with specific themes. Focus areas (from the record): Financial Services · Education · Consumer Protection · Tax Policy Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The absence of declared positions limits the analysis of his activity patterns. What this can't tell you: The record does not provide information on the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; The record does not include information on the politician's motives or intentions; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of his priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Cleo Fields has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2011. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$5K1%
- Large individual (itemized)$285K65%
- PAC / committee$151K34%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Oversight and InvestigationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Capital MarketsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Financial InstitutionsOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
17 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $450,035, spent $237,837, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9511: NFIP Premium Transparency Act ↗Jun 29, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 164: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B); Revocations or Unfavorable Changes to the Terms of Existing Credit Arrangements". ↗Apr 30, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 163: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Application of Regulation Z's Ability-To-Repay Rule to Certain Situations Involving Successors-In-Interest". ↗Apr 30, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8136: DPA Advanced Procurement Act of 2026 ↗Mar 27, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7157: Supporting Teachers Through Tax Fairness Act ↗Jan 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6634: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish a refundable childhood education tax credit with monthly advance payments. ↗Dec 11, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6135: Snap Delivery Modernization Act of 2025 ↗Nov 19, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5084: Teacher Loan Forgiveness Enhancement Act ↗Sep 2, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5083: To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and the Federal Trade Commission to conduct a study on use of additional key factors in credit scoring models, and for other purposes. ↗Sep 2, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3042: Tax-Free Savings and Investment Income Act ↗Mar 7, 1996
- Sponsored HR 2800: Education Trust Fund Act ↗Dec 18, 1995
- Sponsored HR 1247: Insurance Disclosure Act of 1995 ↗Mar 15, 1995
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 609
- Yea
- 267
- Nay
- 322
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 19
Full voting record
609 votes- HR9237Yea
- HR5362Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Yea
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR8595Nay
- HR1181Not voting
- HR1181Not voting
- HR139Not voting
- HRES1423Not voting
- HRES1423Not voting
- HR8897Yea
- HR3106Yea
- HRES1399Yea
- HCONRES108Yea
- HRES1398Nay
- HRES1398Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Stated positions
No stated positions are on record for this official yet. A stated position is what the official says they believe on an issue — a sourced claim, separate from any assessment of what they did. Know one? Add it with a link to where it was said.
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info
Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.