This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Diana DeGette's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

DemocratDiana DeGette
U.S. Representative · Colorado
Colorado's 1st district
U.S. Representative from Colorado
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Diana Degette won the 2024 U.S. House election in Colorado (District 1) with 76.5% of the vote (264,606 votes).
- Diana Degette · Democrat76.5%264,606
- Valdamar Archuleta · Republican21.6%74,598
- 4 Other Candidates1.9%6,531
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Diana DeGette's record shows involvement in health care, environmental issues, and public safety. Notable sponsored bills include the Medicare Advantage Cost Transparency Act and the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act, suggesting involvement in health care transparency and environmental regulation. Additionally, her committee memberships in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, particularly in the Health subcommittee, indicate participation in health-related legislation. Focus areas (from the record): Health Care · Environmental Regulation · Public Safety · Biomedical Research · Workforce Development Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file, making it impossible to assess alignment with any stated goals. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any specific motives or intentions behind the sponsored bills; There is no information on the effectiveness of the sponsored bills or their impact; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess consistency with any public commitments. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Diana DeGette has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2013. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Diana DeGette has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$47K4%
- Large individual (itemized)$487K39%
- PAC / committee$721K57%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Energy and CommerceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Oversight and InvestigationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — EnergyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — HealthOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
233 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,424,135, spent $1,234,561, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9392: Medicare Advantage Cost Transparency Act ↗Jun 23, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1285: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that over 25 years of real-world evidence and hundreds of peer-reviewed studies proving that mifepristone is safe and effective should be respected, and law and policy governing access to lifesaving, time-sensitive medication abortion care in the United States should be equitable, transparent, and based on the best available peer-reviewed evidence-based science. ↗May 14, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8432: To provide the Food and Drug Administration needed authorities to carry out its regulatory mission with respect to human foods, to provide additional resources and authorities with respect to human foods research, and for other purposes. ↗Apr 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7425: Colorado Wilderness Act of 2026 ↗Feb 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7173: Follow the Science Act ↗Jan 21, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6082: Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act of 2025 ↗Nov 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5621: Physical Therapist Workforce and Patient Access Act of 2025 ↗Sep 30, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5461: Special Diabetes Program Reauthorization Act of 2025 ↗Sep 18, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4778: For the relief of Jeanette Vizguerra-Ramirez. ↗Jul 25, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 601: Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to lead the world in biomedical research. ↗Jul 23, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3491: DeOndra Dixon INCLUDE Project Act of 2025 ↗May 19, 2025
- Sponsored HR 2995: Protection from Cumulative Emissions and Underenforcement of Environmental Law Act of 2025 ↗Apr 24, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 233 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 269
- Nay
- 374
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 11
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.