This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Doris O. Matsui's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratDoris O. Matsui
U.S. Representative · California
California's 7th district
U.S. Representative from California
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Doris O. Matsui won the 2024 U.S. House election in California (District 7) with 66.8% of the vote (197,429 votes).
- Doris O. Matsui · Democrat66.8%197,429
- Tom Silva · Republican33.2%98,341
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Doris O. Matsui's record includes legislation related to health, particularly mental health access and public health funding, as evidenced by bills such as the 'Ensuring Excellence in Mental Health Act' and the 'Public Health Funding Restoration Act.' Additionally, there is legislation related to environmental issues, reflected in bills like the 'Climate Change Health Protection and Promotion Act' and the 'Whale CHARTS Act.' Her voting record shows a pattern of voting with her party's majority, with specific data indicating that she voted against her party's majority in approximately 10% of cases. Focus areas (from the record): Health Care · Mental Health · Environmental Protection · Public Health · Telehealth · Consumer Protection Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activity. Therefore, it is not possible to assess alignment with any stated goals. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on the politician's unlogged work or community engagement; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess alignment with constituents' views. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Doris O. Matsui has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2018. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Doris O. Matsui has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$25K2%
- Large individual (itemized)$258K23%
- PAC / committee$820K74%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Energy and CommerceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — EnergyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Communications and TechnologyOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
277 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $2,959,675, spent $1,874,568, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 8936: Digital Opportunity Foundation Act of 2026 ↗May 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8487: Ensuring Excellence in Mental Health Act ↗Apr 23, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 1208: Expressing support for honoring Earth Day, and for other purposes. ↗Apr 22, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8339: Drug Origin Transparency Act of 2026 ↗Apr 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8143: Ensuring Access to Lower-Cost Medicines for Seniors Act of 2026. ↗Mar 27, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7332: Whale CHARTS Act of 2026 ↗Feb 3, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6210: Senior Savings Protection Act ↗Nov 20, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5200: Emergency Reporting Act ↗Sep 8, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5201: Kari's Law Reporting Act ↗Sep 8, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4857: Cruise Passenger Protection Act of 2025 ↗Aug 1, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4581: 340B PATIENTS Act of 2025 ↗Jul 22, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4515: Climate Change Health Protection and Promotion Act of 2025 ↗Jul 17, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 277 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 274
- Nay
- 380
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 0
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Nay
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
3 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record urging congressional leadership to attach Fourth Amendment protections to FISA Section 702 reauthorization: closing the data broker loophole and requiring a judicial warrant before the government accesses Americans' sensitive information, ending the Section 702 backdoor search loophole, and repealing the Section 702 'visa vetting' provision.
SourcesLetter from 53 Members of Congress to Speaker Mike Johnson, Leader John Thune, Leader Charles E. Schumer and Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Fourth Amendment protections in FISA Section 702 reauthorizationView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record asserting that the government ordinarily must obtain a judicial warrant to compel cell phone location data, and urging the DHS Inspector General to open a second investigation into ICE and other DHS components purchasing Americans' location data from commercial data brokers without one.
SourcesBicameral letter to DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari requesting a second investigation of warrantless purchases of Americans' cell phone location data by ICE and other DHS componentsView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.