Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account

This record is only as complete as the public makes it

No one has catalogued Eric A. "Rick" Crawford's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

Eric A. "Rick" Crawford

RepublicanEric A. "Rick" Crawford

U.S. Representative · Arkansas

Arkansas's 1st district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Arkansas

0 tracked promises

Arkansas · Arkansas's 1st district

Arkansas's 1st district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

How they won their seat

Eric A “Rick” Crawford won the 2022 U.S. House election in Arkansas (District 1) with 73.8% of the vote (153,774 votes).

73.8%
Win share
153,774
Votes for winner
208,372
Total cast
  • Eric A “Rick” Crawford · Republican73.8%
  • Monte Hodges · Democrat26.2%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Eric A. Crawford's record includes a pattern of sponsored bills related to intelligence, as evidenced by multiple sponsored bills such as the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (HR 9624) and the Intelligence Community Inspector General Parity Act of 2026 (HR 9209). Additionally, there is a pattern of sponsored bills related to agriculture, demonstrated by bills like the GusNIP Expansion Act and the Prioritizing Offensive Agricultural Disputes and Enforcement Act. Focus areas (from the record): Intelligence · Agriculture · Water Resources · Rural Development · Food Policy Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The evidence does not provide declared positions or tracked promises to compare against the activity patterns based on sponsored bills and committee memberships. What this can't tell you: The effectiveness of the sponsored bills in achieving their intended outcomes is not revealed; There is no information on the politician's public statements or positions that could provide context to their legislative actions; The record does not indicate the extent of collaboration or opposition faced in the legislative process. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Eric A. "Rick" Crawford has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2019–2021 term. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Eric A. "Rick" Crawford has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Bills sponsored
18

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

18bills sponsored
18 awaiting status
035810Bills2019: 10 awaiting status1020192020: 8 awaiting status82020

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 0 sponsored bills became law

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$967K
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$500K$1M$1.5M$2M2026: raised $967K2026: spent $1.1M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $37K (4%)Large individual (itemized): $368K (38%)38%PAC / committee: $556K (58%)58%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$37K4%
  • Large individual (itemized)$368K38%
  • PAC / committee$556K58%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Verified record

130 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Mar 31, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $762,876, spent $491,850, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
456
Nay
138
Present
0
Not voting
15

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

No stated positions are on record for this official yet. A stated position is what the official says they believe on an issue — a sourced claim, separate from any assessment of what they did. Know one? Add it with a link to where it was said.

Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →