This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Greg Stanton's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratGreg Stanton
U.S. Representative · Arizona
Arizona's 4th district
U.S. Representative from Arizona
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Greg Stanton won the 2024 U.S. House election in Arizona (District 4) with 52.7% of the vote (176,428 votes).
- Greg Stanton · Democrat52.7%176,428
- Kelly Cooper · Republican45.5%152,052
- Vincent Beck-Jones · Green1.8%6,065
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Greg Stanton's record includes legislation related to infrastructure, public health, and community support, as evidenced by his sponsorship of bills such as the 'Fund Schools, Not ICE Act' and the 'Urban Waters Federal Partnership Act of 2025'. His committee memberships include the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Focus areas (from the record): infrastructure · public health · community support · transportation · foreign affairs Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against Stanton's legislative activities and voting patterns. What this can't tell you: The motivations behind his legislative choices are not disclosed; The effectiveness of his sponsored bills is unclear, as none have become law; There is no information on his public statements or specific promises made during his campaigns. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Greg Stanton has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2025. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Greg Stanton has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$91K4%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.4M66%
- PAC / committee$639K30%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Foreign AffairsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist PartyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure — AviationOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure — Highways and TransitOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure — Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency ManagementOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
- Member, House Committee on Foreign Affairs — Western HemisphereOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
79 sponsored billsFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9659: Fund Schools, Not ICE Act ↗Jul 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9301: Extreme Heat Congressional Advisory Commission Act ↗Jun 11, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8557: Short-Term Holding Facility Standards Restoration Act. ↗Apr 28, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8287: Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 ↗Apr 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8188: Tribal Roads Improvement Act ↗Apr 2, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7714: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 101 North Colorado Street in Chandler, Arizona, as the "Mayor Coy Payne Memorial Post Office Building". ↗Feb 25, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6992: EB–5 Regional Center Program Advisory Committee Authorization Act ↗Jan 9, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6701: HEAT Act of 2025 ↗Dec 12, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6481: Federal Building Threat Notification Act ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6480: To direct the Administrator of General Services to submit a report to Congress on the state of the real estate portfolio of the Public Building Service, and for other purposes. ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5922: Improving Accessibility Through Microtransit Act ↗Nov 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4532: American Cooperation with Our Neighbors Act ↗Jul 17, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 299
- Nay
- 342
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 14
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Not voting
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
2 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NAY in the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on Perry Amendment No. 221 to H.R. 8870, an amendment providing that a recipient of assistance under title 23, United States Code, may not use automated license plate readers for any purpose other than tolling. The amendment was not agreed to, 20 yeas to 44 nays.
SourcesCommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure, 119th Congress, Full Committee Record of Committee Votes 75 to 127 on H.R. 8870 (markup of May 21, 2026); Vote 104 on Perry Amendment No. 221, restricting automated license plate reader use by recipients of title 23 highway assistance. Not agreed to, 20 yeas to 44 nays.View position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.