This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Gregory W. Meeks's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratGregory W. Meeks
U.S. Representative · New York
New York's 5th district
U.S. Representative from New York
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Gregory W. Meeks won the 2024 U.S. House election in New York (District 5) with 72.7% of the vote (168,425 votes).
- Gregory W. Meeks · Democrat72.7%168,425
- Paul King · Republican24.5%56,689
- Blank · Na5.2%12,060
- Conservative · Common Sense2.5%5,840
- 1 Other Candidate0.3%782
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
The record includes multiple sponsored resolutions related to military involvement and international relations, such as HCONRES 40 and HJRES 96. Additionally, there are several bills related to financial services and consumer protection, including HR 5508 and HJRES 173. Focus areas (from the record): Foreign Affairs · Military Oversight · Consumer Protection · Financial Services · International Relations Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against the inferred activity patterns, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills or their impact; There is no information on the politician's motives or personal beliefs; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess consistency with stated goals. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Gregory W. Meeks has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2019. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Gregory W. Meeks has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$36K4%
- Large individual (itemized)$241K24%
- PAC / committee$742K73%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Financial ServicesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Foreign AffairsOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Capital MarketsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Financial Services — Financial InstitutionsOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
231 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $1,575,073, spent $1,854,342, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 8854: Habitable Housing Conversion Pilot Program Act of 2026 ↗May 15, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 173: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2023-02: Reopening Deposit Accounts That Consumers Previously Closed". ↗May 4, 2026
- Sponsored HCONRES 86: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. ↗Apr 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8289: BIS Licensing Efficiency Act of 2026 ↗Apr 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8222: End Russian Oil Windfalls Act ↗Apr 9, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 150: Terminating the national emergency declared to impose global tariffs. ↗Feb 17, 2026
- Sponsored HJRES 147: Terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil. ↗Feb 2, 2026
- Sponsored HR 6879: RESTRICT Act ↗Dec 18, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 956: Condemning the antisemitic shooting in Sydney, Australia, and all forms of hatred and violence directed at religious communities. ↗Dec 17, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 943: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 117) relating to a national emergency by the President on July 30, 2025. ↗Dec 10, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 929: Reaffirming the commitment of the United States to cooperate and partner with the Government of Honduras to counter narcotics and condemning the pardon of Juan Orlando Hernández. ↗Dec 4, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6338: Stop Illegal Fishing Act ↗Dec 1, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 231 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 266
- Nay
- 361
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 27
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Not voting
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.