Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Hakeem S. Jeffries

DemocratHakeem S. Jeffries

U.S. Representative · New York

New York's 8th district

DemocratFederal

U.S. Representative from New York

2 tracked promises

New York · New York's 8th district

New York's 8th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

How they won their seat

Hakeem S. Jeffries won the 2024 U.S. House election in New York (District 8) with 75.1% of the vote (168,036 votes).

75.1%
Win share
168,036
Votes for winner
241,150
Total cast
  • Hakeem S. Jeffries · Democrat75.1%
  • John J. Delaney · Conservative24.5%
  • Blank · Na7.8%
  • 1 Other Candidate0.4%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

The record indicates a pattern of legislation related to recognizing cultural contributions, particularly related to Cabo Verdean-Americans, as seen in HRES 625 and HRES 1396. Additionally, there is a pattern of sponsored legislation related to social issues, such as the Prison to Proprietorship for Formerly Incarcerated Act (HR 7273) and the Human Trafficking Prevention Act (HR 7181). Focus areas (from the record): Cultural Recognition · Social Justice · Healthcare Access · Veterans Affairs · Transparency Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against the inferred activity patterns. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on the politician's declared positions or promises; The record does not indicate the reasons behind voting patterns or the impact of campaign finance. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Hakeem S. Jeffries has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2023. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Hakeem S. Jeffries has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Bills sponsored
3

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

3bills sponsored
3 pending
01234Bills2023: 3 pending32023

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 3 sponsored bills became law
3 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$6.0M
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$2.5M$5M$7.5M$10M2026: raised $6.0M2026: spent $6.0M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $327K (7%)7%Large individual (itemized): $2.5M (51%)51%PAC / committee: $2.1M (42%)42%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$327K7%
  • Large individual (itemized)$2.5M51%
  • PAC / committee$2.1M42%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Integrity

Not yet rated

No promises have been rated yet, so there is no Integrity Score to show. Lifecycle promises (in progress, not yet rated) are tracked but never scored.

The score, once promises are rated, is a signed −100…+100 breakdown weighted by significance and evidence confidence — never a single opaque grade. How this is measured.

Integrity over time

The integrity timeline appears here once this official's promises are rated. In office since Jan 2019.
Not yet scoredNot yet rated 2— tracked, but not counted toward Integrity

Topic coverage

2 promises across 2 topics

What this record covers — the number of tracked promises per topic. This is coverage, not a verdict; the kept/against shading within each bar mirrors the Integrity breakdown above.

  • Economy / Cost of Living1 promise
  • Health Care1 promise

Evidence & significance

Evidence quality

Strongest source cited per promise.

  • Reputable news2100%

Significance mix

How weighty the tracked promises are (1 = minor, 5 = defining).

10
20
30
40
52

Significance weights each promise in the Integrity Score.

Tracked promises

2 tracked promises

Not yet rated

The first bill (H.R. 1) of a Democratic House majority will be legislation to lower the cost of living, developed through five working groups covering housing, gas and utilities, groceries and goods, caregiving, and health care.

Economy / Cost of LivingSpecific · measurablePromised Jun 2026
Sourceshttps://www.eenews.net/articles/jeffries-first-bill-of-dem-majority-would-tackle-affordability/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/06/08/report-rep-jeffries-drafts-affordability-agenda-puts-aoc-in-charge-of-health-care-trans-dem-in-charge-of-caregiving/https://governorswindenergycoalition.org/jeffries-first-bill-of-dem-majority-would-tackle-affordability/
Not yet rated

Extend the enhanced Affordable Care Act premium tax credits for three years.

Health CareSpecific · measurablePromised Dec 2025
Sourceshttps://abcnews.com/Politics/house-vote-obamacare-subsidies-extension-after-9-republicans/story?id=129026545https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jeffries-reveals-last-minute-move-extend-covid-era-subsidies-house-shutdown-vote-looms

Verified record

124 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Jun 3, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $13,992,480, spent $14,002,285, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
264
Nay
342
Present
1
Not voting
2

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

2 positions on record

What this official says they believe — sourced claims, shown distinctly from tracked promises and from any assessment of what they did. A stated position is never scored and never affects the Integrity Score.

  • Economy / Cost of LivingStated position

    The first bill (H.R. 1) of a Democratic House majority will be legislation to lower the cost of living, developed through five working groups covering housing, gas and utilities, groceries and goods, caregiving, and health care.

    Sourceshttps://www.eenews.net/articles/jeffries-first-bill-of-dem-majority-would-tackle-affordability/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/06/08/report-rep-jeffries-drafts-affordability-agenda-puts-aoc-in-charge-of-health-care-trans-dem-in-charge-of-caregiving/https://governorswindenergycoalition.org/jeffries-first-bill-of-dem-majority-would-tackle-affordability/
    View position & sources →
  • Health CareStated position

    Extend the enhanced Affordable Care Act premium tax credits for three years.

    Sourceshttps://abcnews.com/Politics/house-vote-obamacare-subsidies-extension-after-9-republicans/story?id=129026545https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jeffries-reveals-last-minute-move-extend-covid-era-subsidies-house-shutdown-vote-looms
    View position & sources →
Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Help complete the record on this official

What you see above is only what volunteers have catalogued so far — never the whole picture. Know a campaign promise that's missing, or have a source showing one was kept or broken? Add it, and StumpWatch tracks Hakeem S. Jeffries more completely. Every submission must cite where it came from, stays neutral, and is open to correction.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →