This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Ilhan Omar's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratIlhan Omar
U.S. Representative · Minnesota
Minnesota's 5th district
U.S. Representative from Minnesota
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Ilhan Omar won the 2024 U.S. House election in Minnesota (District 5) with 74.4% of the vote (261,066 votes).
- Ilhan Omar · Democrat74.4%261,066
- Dalia Al-Aqidi · Republican24.6%86,213
- 1 Other Candidate1.1%3,768
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Ilhan Omar's record indicates involvement in education-related policies and environmental issues. Sponsored bills include the 'Universal School Meals Program Act of 2026' and the 'End Polluter Welfare Act of 2025', suggesting an emphasis on education and environmental issues. Additionally, her involvement in the House Committee on Education and Workforce reflects her engagement in education-related matters. Focus areas (from the record): Social Justice · Education · Environmental Policy · International Relations · Public Health Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her sponsored bills and voting record. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of her sponsored bills; There is no information on her unlogged work or community engagement; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of her priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Ilhan Omar has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2020. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Ilhan Omar has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$3.7M65%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.9M33%
- PAC / committee$74K1%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Education and WorkforceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on the BudgetOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Education and Workforce — Higher Education and Workforce DevelopmentOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on Education and Workforce — Workforce ProtectionsOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
120 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $5,090,953, spent $3,842,103, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1435: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should ratify the Rome Statute and join the International Criminal Court. ↗Jul 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9526: Protecting Europe from Islamophobia Act ↗Jun 29, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8988: Frank Adelmann Manufactured Housing Community Sustainability Act of 2026 ↗May 21, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8798: Universal School Meals Program Act of 2026 ↗May 13, 2026
- Sponsored HR 5720: Federal Worker Childcare Protection Act of 2025 ↗Oct 8, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5655: No Shame at School Act of 2025 ↗Sep 30, 2025
- Sponsored HCONRES 51: To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities that have not been authorized by Congress. ↗Sep 23, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 669: Honoring the victims and survivors of the mass shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church and School in Minneapolis, Minnesota. ↗Sep 2, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4714: End Polluter Welfare Act of 2025 ↗Jul 23, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 606: Supporting the goals and ideals of World Drowning Prevention Day. ↗Jul 23, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4241: Syria Sanctions Relief Act ↗Jun 27, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 451: Expressing condemnation for police brutality wherever in the world it occurs. ↗May 29, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 120 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 256
- Nay
- 384
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 15
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Nay
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
2 positions on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyStated position
On record urging congressional leadership to attach Fourth Amendment protections to FISA Section 702 reauthorization: closing the data broker loophole and requiring a judicial warrant before the government accesses Americans' sensitive information, ending the Section 702 backdoor search loophole, and repealing the Section 702 'visa vetting' provision.
SourcesLetter from 53 Members of Congress to Speaker Mike Johnson, Leader John Thune, Leader Charles E. Schumer and Leader Hakeem Jeffries urging Fourth Amendment protections in FISA Section 702 reauthorizationView position & sources → - Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting AYE on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.