This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Jake Ellzey's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
RepublicanJake Ellzey
U.S. Representative · Texas
Texas's 6th district
U.S. Representative from Texas
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Jake Ellzey won the 2024 U.S. House election in Texas (District 6) with 65.7% of the vote (188,119 votes).
- Jake Ellzey · Republican65.7%188,119
- John Love Iii · Democrat34.3%98,319
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Jake Ellzey's record shows support for law enforcement, commemoration of military service, and promotion of small business initiatives. He has sponsored resolutions related to Red Ribbon Week and legislation aimed at tax credits for apprenticeships, related to education and workforce development. His committee assignments include appropriations, with involvement in defense and small business. Focus areas (from the record): Law Enforcement · Military Commemoration · Small Business · Education · Workforce Development Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against his legislative activities and voting patterns. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any stated goals or intentions behind the sponsored bills; There is no information on the effectiveness or impact of the sponsored legislation; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of his priorities or commitments. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Jake Ellzey has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2026. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Jake Ellzey has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$447K19%
- Large individual (itemized)$1.2M50%
- PAC / committee$744K31%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on AppropriationsOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Small BusinessOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Small Business — Contracting and InfrastructureOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Chairman, House Committee on Small Business — Rural Development, Energy, and Supply ChainsOn record since Jan 2025Chair
- Vice Chair, House Committee on Appropriations — DefenseOn record since Jan 2025Chair
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — Interior, Environment, and Related AgenciesOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
11 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $3,705,546, spent $2,700,452, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 881: Condemning the recent attacks on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection Law Enforcement personnel and facilities. ↗Nov 17, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 834: Supporting the goals and ideals of Red Ribbon Week during the period of October 23 through October 31, 2025. ↗Oct 28, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4845: To designate the National Memorial Day Parade, and for other purposes. ↗Aug 1, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3871: Apprenticeship Infrastructure Tax Credit Act of 2025 ↗Jun 10, 2025
- Sponsored HR 6591: Encouraging Success Act ↗Dec 5, 2023
- Sponsored HR 6378: To permit the remains of any Medal of Honor recipient to lie in honor in the rotunda of the United States Capitol, and for other purposes. ↗Nov 13, 2023
- Sponsored HRES 747: Supporting the goals and ideals of Red Ribbon Week during the period of October 23 through October 31, 2023. ↗Sep 29, 2023
- Sponsored HR 8408: Federal Mask Mandate Limitations Act ↗Jul 18, 2022
- Sponsored HR 6626: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3903 Melear Drive in Arlington, Texas, as the "Ron Wright Post Office Building". ↗Feb 7, 2022
- Sponsored HR 6365: To direct the Surface Transportation Board to require any high-speed rail project to acquire all land for the project before starting construction, and for other purposes. ↗Jan 10, 2022
- Sponsored HR 5516: VITAL Assessment Act ↗Oct 8, 2021
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 490
- Nay
- 155
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 10
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Yea
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Nay
- HCONRES113Yea
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.