This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Jennifer L. McClellan's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratJennifer L. McClellan
U.S. Representative · Virginia
Virginia's 4th district
U.S. Representative from Virginia
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Jennifer L. McClellan won the 2024 U.S. House election in Virginia (District 4) with 67.3% of the vote (252,885 votes).
- Jennifer L. McClellan · Democrat67.3%252,885
- \"William J. \\"\"Bill\\"\" Moher Iii\" · Republican32.4%121,814
- 1 Other Candidate0.2%809
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Jennifer L. McClellan's record includes sponsorship of bills related to health, education, and civil rights, such as the Mental Health Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2025 and the Student Veteran Work Study Modernization Act. Additionally, she has participated in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Focus areas (from the record): Health · Education · Civil Rights · Energy · Technology Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activity, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal her specific motivations or intentions behind the sponsored bills; There is no information on her effectiveness in passing legislation beyond the one bill that became law; The absence of declared positions limits the ability to assess her overall political strategy or priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Jennifer L. McClellan has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2026. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Jennifer L. McClellan has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Monthly voting activity
- Yea
- Nay
- Total
Roll-call votes per month — most recent on file. Source: Voteview.
Vote attendance
Share of roll calls participated in — most recent votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Independence
How often they break with their party’s majority — neither good nor bad, just the record.
Most recent roll-call votes on file. Source: Voteview.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$79K7%
- Large individual (itemized)$447K39%
- PAC / committee$608K54%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on Energy and CommerceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — EnergyOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Energy and Commerce — Communications and TechnologyOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
49 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $891,048, spent $817,336, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HRES 1357: Acknowledging and apologizing for the mistreatment of, and discrimination against, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals who served the United States in the uniformed services, the Foreign Service, and the Federal civil service and committing to the pursuit of equal rights, protections, and respect for all LGBT servicemembers and Federal civil servants. ↗Jun 11, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9177: Improving Mentorship in STEM Higher Education Act ↗Jun 8, 2026
- Sponsored HR 9155: CONSENT Act ↗Jun 4, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8853: Amtrak Grant Flexibility Act ↗May 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7783: AI-Ready Networks Act ↗Mar 4, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7676: Career-Connected Learning Pathways Act of 2026 ↗Feb 25, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7341: GRAD Act ↗Feb 4, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 964: Recognizing the bicentennial of the historic DACOR Bacon House. ↗Dec 18, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 955: Recognizing the importance of a continued commitment to ending pediatric HIV/AIDS worldwide. ↗Dec 17, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 877: Expressing support for the designation of "Prematurity Awareness Month". ↗Nov 17, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5965: Student Veteran Work Study Modernization Act ↗Nov 7, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 720: Expressing support for the designation of September 2025 as "African Diaspora Heritage Month". ↗Sep 16, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 275
- Nay
- 377
- Present
- 3
- Not voting
- 0
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.