This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Lucy McBath's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.
DemocratLucy McBath
U.S. Representative · Georgia
Georgia's 6th district
U.S. Representative from Georgia
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Lucy McBath won the 2024 U.S. House election in Georgia (District 6) with 74.7% of the vote (277,027 votes).
- Lucy McBath · Democrat74.7%277,027
- Jeff Criswell · Republican25.3%93,909
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Lucy McBath's record shows involvement in education, workforce development, and gun control, as evidenced by her sponsorship of bills such as the Early Childhood Workforce Advancement Act of 2026 and the Assault Weapons Ban of 2025. Additionally, her involvement in committees related to education and workforce is noted, while her voting record reflects a tendency to align with the majority of her party's positions. Focus areas (from the record): Education · Workforce Development · Gun Control · Public Safety · Health Care Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activities and voting record. What this can't tell you: The specific effectiveness of her sponsored bills in achieving their intended outcomes; The impact of her committee work on legislation beyond her sponsored bills; Any unlogged activities or informal engagements that may influence her legislative priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Lucy McBath has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2024. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Lucy McBath has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$54K6%
- Large individual (itemized)$479K55%
- PAC / committee$343K39%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Member, House Committee on the JudiciaryOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Education and WorkforceOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Ranking Member, House Committee on the Judiciary — Crime and Federal Government SurveillanceOn record since Jan 2025Ranking
- Member, House Committee on Education and Workforce — Higher Education and Workforce DevelopmentOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Member, House Committee on Education and Workforce — Health, Employment, Labor, and PensionsOn record since Jan 2025Member
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
71 sponsored bills · finance on fileFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
FEC 2026 cycle — raised $756,529, spent $1,088,802, cash on hand $0.
View the FEC filing ↗Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 9754: To direct the Secretary of Labor to require group health plans include certain information on claim denials in annual reports, and for other purposes. ↗Jul 16, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8937: Early Childhood Workforce Advancement Act of 2026 ↗May 20, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8304: CREATES Act ↗Apr 15, 2026
- Sponsored HR 8055: Extending WIC for New Moms Act ↗Mar 24, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7599: Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026 ↗Feb 17, 2026
- Sponsored HR 7333: Family Violence Prevention and Services Improvement Act of 2026 ↗Feb 3, 2026
- Sponsored HRES 760: Supporting the designation of the week of September 22 through September 26, 2025, as "National Hazing Awareness Week". ↗Sep 23, 2025
- Sponsored HR 5476: Preparing And Retaining All (PARA) Educators Act ↗Sep 18, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 714: Expressing support for designation of the week of September 14 through 20, 2025, as "National Adult Education and Family Literacy Week". ↗Sep 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4701: Charting My Path for Future Success Act ↗Jul 23, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4602: Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act ↗Jul 22, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3985: Helping Student Parents Succeed Act ↗Jun 12, 2025
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 277
- Nay
- 346
- Present
- 1
- Not voting
- 31
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Nay
- HR1501Nay
- HJRES1Nay
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HR9436Yea
- HRES1490Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HRES1499Nay
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Nay
- HCONRES89Yea
- HCONRES113Nay
- HR7008Nay
- HR7008Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.