This record is only as complete as the public makes it
No one has catalogued Mario Diaz-Balart's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

RepublicanMario Diaz-Balart
U.S. Representative · Florida
Florida's 26th district
U.S. Representative from Florida
0 tracked promises
Trust rating
Not yet rated
Not enough rated promises yet to provide an accurate Trust Rating.
Their tracked promises haven’t been rated against the record yet.
A Trust Rating appears once their promises have been rated against what they actually did. How this is measured. Help build the record →
How they won their seat
Mario Diaz-Balart won the 2024 U.S. House election in Florida (District 26) with 70.9% of the vote (217,199 votes).
- Mario Diaz-Balart · Republican70.9%217,199
- Joey Atkins · Democrat29.1%89,072
Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.
Inferred legislative agendas
Mario Diaz-Balart's record demonstrates activity in national security and foreign relations, with notable activity related to Cuba and Venezuela, as evidenced by multiple sponsored bills such as the 'STOP MADURO Act' and resolutions commending Cuban activists. Additionally, he has sponsored various appropriations bills related to the Department of State and national security, suggesting an emphasis on funding and oversight in these areas. Focus areas (from the record): National Security · Cuba · Venezuela · Appropriations · Postal Services · Veterans Affairs Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. No declared positions or tracked promises are available to compare against his sponsored bills and voting record. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on the politician's engagement outside of sponsored bills and votes; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of his priorities or goals. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).
Inferred, not stated. Mario Diaz-Balart has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.
Showing 2012. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.
Activity in office
What Mario Diaz-Balart has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score. The tracked-positions tile counts sourced stated positions — claims about what they believe, not conduct — and is likewise never scored.
Roll-call data last updated September 7, 2026 · source: Voteview.
Bills sponsored over time
Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.
Bill success rate
Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.
Campaign finance over time
- Small-dollar (unitemized)$4K0%
- Large individual (itemized)$421K31%
- PAC / committee$944K69%
By election cycle. Source: FEC.
Committee memberships
- Vice Chair, House Committee on AppropriationsOn record since Jan 2025Chair
- Member, House Committee on Appropriations — DefenseOn record since Jan 2025Member
- Chair, House Committee on Appropriations — National Security, Department of State, and Related ProgramsOn record since Jan 2025Chair
Source: Congress.gov.
Verified record
102 sponsored billsFacts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.
Sponsored legislation
- Sponsored HR 8595: National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027 ↗Apr 30, 2026
- Sponsored HR 4779: National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2026 ↗Jul 25, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4558: To designate the area between the intersections of 16th Street Northwest and Fuller Street Northwest and 16th Street Northwest and Euclid Street Northwest in Washington, District of Columbia, as "Oswaldo Payá Way". ↗Jul 21, 2025
- Sponsored HR 4397: Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025 ↗Jul 15, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3958: To require the United States Postal Service to notify postal customers and relevant officials when operations are temporarily suspended at a post office, and for other purposes. ↗Jun 12, 2025
- Sponsored HR 3583: To amend title 4, United States Code, to ensure that a funeral honors detail recites the 13 Folds of Honor when presenting a flag of the United States in connection with the death of a member of the Armed Forces or veteran. ↗May 23, 2025
- Sponsored HRES 325: Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the city of Hialeah, Florida. ↗Apr 10, 2025
- Sponsored HR 1299: EAGLES Act of 2025 ↗Feb 13, 2025
- Sponsored HR 672: To establish new ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes. ↗Jan 23, 2025
- Sponsored HR 268: STOP MADURO Act ↗Jan 9, 2025
- Sponsored HR 9692: STOP MADURO Act ↗Sep 19, 2024
- Sponsored HR 9401: To amend title 4, United States Code, to ensure that a funeral honors detail recites the 13 Folds of Honor when presenting a flag of the United States in connection with the death of a member of the Armed Forces or veteran. ↗Aug 23, 2024
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 sponsored measures.
Voting record
- Total votes
- 655
- Yea
- 478
- Nay
- 151
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 26
Full voting record
655 votes- HR4795Yea
- HR1501Yea
- HJRES1Yea
- HRES1498Yea
- HR9436Yea
- HR9436Nay
- HRES1490Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HRES1499Yea
- HR6500Yea
- S32Yea
- S307Yea
- HR8884Yea
- HCONRES89Nay
- HCONRES113Yea
- HR7008Yea
- HR7008Nay
- HR8800Yea
- HR8800Nay
- HR8800Nay
Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.
Positions on record
1 position on recordThe record on this issue — recorded votes this official cast, and sourced claims about what they believe. Each is labelled with which it is, because a vote is what someone did and a statement is what they said. Neither is scored, and neither affects the Integrity Score.
- Mass Surveillance, Tracking, and Flock SafetyRecorded vote
On record voting NO on Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act, an amendment to prohibit warrantless searches of United States persons' communications in the FISA Section 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, and known cybersecurity threat signatures. The amendment failed on a 212 to 212 tie.
SourcesHouse Roll Call Vote 114, 118th Congress, 2nd Session: On Agreeing to the Amendment, Biggs of Arizona Amendment No. 1 to H.R. 7888, the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act. Failed by recorded vote, 212 ayes to 212 noes, April 12, 2024.View position & sources →
Disclosure
A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.
No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.
Suggest a correction to this official's info
See something wrong or out of date — the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo? Suggest a sourced correction. Every suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Free — it takes a minute. New here? Create an account and complete the Contributor Agreement once.