Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account

This record is only as complete as the public makes it

No one has catalogued Mark Pocan's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

Mark Pocan

DemocratMark Pocan

U.S. Representative · Wisconsin

Wisconsin's 2nd district

DemocratFederal

U.S. Representative from Wisconsin

0 tracked promises

Wisconsin · Wisconsin's 2nd district

Wisconsin's 2nd district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

Running against

How they won their seat

Mark Pocan won the 2024 U.S. House election in Wisconsin (District 2) with 70.1% of the vote (320,317 votes).

70.1%
Win share
320,317
Votes for winner
457,257
Total cast
  • Mark Pocan · Democrat70.1%
  • Erik Olsen · Republican29.8%
  • 1 Other Candidate0.1%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Mark Pocan's record includes sponsorship of bills related to health care, education, and social justice, as evidenced by his sponsorship of bills such as the 'Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act' and multiple measures aimed at reforming Medicare. Additionally, his record includes sponsorship of bills related to LGBTQI+ rights and anti-harassment initiatives through bills like the 'National Museum of American LGBTQI+ History and Culture Act' and the 'Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act'. Focus areas (from the record): Health Care · Education · Social Justice · LGBTQI+ Rights · Medicare Reform Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. The alignment assessment is based on the lack of declared positions or tracked promises to compare against legislative activities. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal any declared positions or promises that could provide context for his legislative focus; There is no information on the effectiveness of the sponsored bills or their reception in Congress; The record does not indicate any potential unlogged work or advocacy outside of sponsored bills. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Mark Pocan has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2023. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Mark Pocan has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Bills sponsored
16

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

16bills sponsored
16 pending
05101520Bills2023: 16 pending162023

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 16 sponsored bills became law
16 pending

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$1.1M
Raised, 20262026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$500K$1M$1.5M$2M2026: raised $1.1M2026: spent $1.0M20262026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $263K (23%)23%Large individual (itemized): $333K (29%)29%PAC / committee: $548K (48%)48%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$263K23%
  • Large individual (itemized)$333K29%
  • PAC / committee$548K48%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Verified record

159 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Mar 31, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $643,149, spent $672,984, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Sponsored legislation

Showing the 12 most recent of 159 sponsored measures.

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
251
Nay
349
Present
1
Not voting
8

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

No stated positions are on record for this official yet. A stated position is what the official says they believe on an issue — a sourced claim, separate from any assessment of what they did. Know one? Add it with a link to where it was said.

Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →