Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account

This record is only as complete as the public makes it

No one has catalogued Michelle Fischbach's campaign promises yet — and an empty page holds no one accountable. StumpWatch is built by volunteers, one sourced promise at a time. Be the first to add this official's promises: paste a campaign pledge or public statement with a link to where it was said, and we'll start tracking whether it's kept. Every entry is sourced, neutral, and open to correction.

Michelle Fischbach

RepublicanMichelle Fischbach

U.S. Representative · Minnesota

Minnesota's 7th district

RepublicanFederal

U.S. Representative from Minnesota

0 tracked promises

Minnesota · Minnesota's 7th district

Minnesota's 7th district

Their congressional district

View district dashboard →

Running against

How they won their seat

Michelle Fischbach won the 2024 U.S. House election in Minnesota (District 7) with 70.4% of the vote (275,098 votes).

70.4%
Win share
275,098
Votes for winner
390,510
Total cast
  • Michelle Fischbach · Republican70.4%
  • \"A J \\"\"John\\"\" Peters\" · Democratic-Farmer-Labor29.4%
  • 1 Other Candidate0.1%

Certified results. Source: MIT Election Data + Science Lab (MEDSL) ↗. A plurality winner can hold under 50% when more than two candidates run.

Inferred legislative agendas

Michelle Fischbach's record shows a concentration on legislative efforts related to tax policy, healthcare access, and rural issues. Notable sponsored bills include the 'Protecting America’s Seniors’ Access to Care Act' (HR 1303) and the 'Investing in Rural America Act of 2025' (HR 1246), suggesting involvement in healthcare and rural development. Additionally, her involvement in the House Committee on Ways and Means indicates involvement in trade and economic issues. Focus areas (from the record): tax policy · healthcare access · rural development · trade · oversight Alignment with declared positions: Insufficient evidence. There are no declared positions or tracked promises on file to compare against her legislative activities, making it impossible to assess alignment. What this can't tell you: The record does not reveal the effectiveness of the sponsored bills; There is no information on her unlogged work or informal activities; The absence of declared positions limits understanding of her priorities. Confidence: moderate (based on the volume of verified record on file).

Inferred, not stated. Michelle Fischbach has not necessarily stated these as goals. This is an AI-generated, nonpartisan reading of the patterns in their verified record — sponsored legislation, committee work, roll-call votes, and campaign-finance composition — and how those patterns compare to any declared positions and tracked promises. It describes what the record emphasizes, never imputes motive, and is run through an adversarial review pass that scrubs bias, loaded language, and any claim the evidence doesn’t support. It is not a quote, a claim they made, or a rating; every underlying item is sourced in the verified record below; and it never affects the Integrity Score.

Showing 2021. Every tile and chart below reflects this window; some record types (e.g. roll-call votes) only have data for recent years.

Activity in office

What Michelle Fischbach has actually done in office — sourced from official roll-call and government records, shown in full below. These are facts, separate from tracked promises and never folded into any score.

Bills sponsored
12

Roll-call data last updated July 20, 2026 · source: Voteview.

Bills sponsored over time

12bills sponsored
12 awaiting status
05101520Bills2021: 12 awaiting status122021

Bills sponsored per year, stacked by outcome (latest action). Outcome data covers the 118th–119th Congresses; earlier years show as “awaiting status” until enriched. Source: Congress.gov.

Bill success rate

0%
0 of 0 sponsored bills became law

Bills SPONSORED in the 118th–119th Congresses, by their latest action. Source: Congress.gov.

Campaign finance over time

$0
Cash on hand · 2026
$3.0M
Raised, 20242026
RaisedSpentCash on hand
$0$625K$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M2024: raised $2.0M2024: spent $1.6M20242026: raised $988K2026: spent $592K20262024: cash on hand $02026: cash on hand $0
Where the money came from · 2026
Small-dollar (unitemized): $125K (14%)14%Large individual (itemized): $262K (28%)28%PAC / committee: $535K (58%)58%
  • Small-dollar (unitemized)$125K14%
  • Large individual (itemized)$262K28%
  • PAC / committee$535K58%

By election cycle. Source: FEC.

Committee memberships

Source: Congress.gov.

Verified record

68 sponsored bills · finance on file

Facts imported directly from official government sources — shown separately from tracked promises and never folded into the Integrity Score. Each entry links to its primary source.

Campaign financeas of Mar 31, 2026

FEC 2026 cycle — raised $987,633, spent $591,816, cash on hand $0.

View the FEC filing ↗

Sponsored legislation

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 sponsored measures.

Voting record

Total votes
609
Yea
476
Nay
130
Present
0
Not voting
3

Full voting record

609 votes
120 of 609
Page 1 / 31

Roll-call votes, 119th Congress. Source: Voteview (voteview.com). Click any vote to verify it independently.

Stated positions

No stated positions are on record for this official yet. A stated position is what the official says they believe on an issue — a sourced claim, separate from any assessment of what they did. Know one? Add it with a link to where it was said.

Disclosure
No undisclosed priorities on record

Disclosure

A separate measure from the promise scorecard above. It tracks confirmed cases where this official has acted on or championed an issue that already existed when they ran, but which they did not disclose as a priority in their campaign. Each case meets a high evidence bar — three independent sources — and the score is shown alongside the Integrity Score, never merged into it. How this is measured.

No undisclosed priorities on record. This is not a clean-audit claim — it means none have been confirmed for this official.

Office context & community edits
Suggest a correction to this official's info

Suggest a sourced correction to the biography, party, jurisdiction, common name, or photo. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →